Teams

FBurbano

2022 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-18vs MLalor 5.5 ComboLost 01
L#1 DoublesTodd Sprouse / David McNulty vs Michael Givner / Matt Cantando3-6, 5-7
2022-10-11vs JHENRY ComboLost 01
L#2 DoublesTodd Sprouse / BJ Fungaroli vs Bonner Gaylord / Bryant Paris2-6, 3-6
2022-10-04vs GFye - 7Oaks/5.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesTodd Sprouse / Peter Flack vs Harrison Edwards / Shawn Skillman6-3, 6-3
2022-09-27vs MLalor 5.5 ComboWon 10
W#1 DoublesFrancisco Burbano / David McNulty vs Gregg Newton / Matt Cantando4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-09-13vs GFye - 7Oaks/5.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesTerry Bollinger / Francisco Burbano vs Robert Marriott / Kevin Mann4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTodd Sprouse / BJ Fungaroli vs Michael Bender / Kevin Lindsay4-6, 2-6
2022-09-06vs MLalor 5.5 ComboWon 10
W#1 DoublesFrancisco Burbano / Michael Ratliff vs Gregg Newton / Karl Deonanan7-6, 6-2
2022-08-30Won 10
W#2 DoublesTodd Sprouse / BJ Fungaroli vs Duncan Gibson / Matthew Peterson6-2, 6-1
2022-08-23vs GFye - 7Oaks/5.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesFrancisco Burbano / David McNulty vs Jakob Lagerstedt / Gary Fye2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBJ Fungaroli / Todd Sprouse vs Robert Marriott / Kevin Mann3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Michael Ratliff
published
3.13
Francisco Burbano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Richard Johnson
published
2.84
Todd Sprouse
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.74
David McNulty
published 3
2.63
Peter Flack
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Todd Sprouse + Francisco Burbano6552% games+1.2% vs expected
Todd Sprouse + David McNulty134 matchesnot enough data
Francisco Burbano + Michael Ratliff213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Ratliff
30W–24L career · no lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Francisco Burbano
79W–83L career · 4 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
Richard Johnson
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Todd Sprouse
85W–99L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
David McNulty
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
Peter Flack
11W–27L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.