Teams

KY/LEX/Cox/ Lane

2025 USTA LEAGUE 40 & Over ADULT LEXINGTON · Men 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-02-27vs KY/LEX/SPARKSLost 01
L#1 DoublesJordan Yeiser / Headley Butler vs Kelly Lykins / Taylor Huber5-7, 3-6
2025-01-30vs KY/LEX/SPARKSLost 02
L#1 SinglesJordan Yeiser vs Randall Owens3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKevin Lear / Justin Ross vs Eric Sauvage / Darryl Baker2-6, 6-7
2025-01-17vs KY/LEX/CASTLELost 01
L#1 DoublesTaylor Lyle / Justin Ross vs Leonce Bargeron / Carlos Verdecchia0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Jordan Yeiser
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Justin Ross
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Andrew Knight
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
DL Holland
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Headley Butler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
J Peter Cassidy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kevin Lear
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Onur Camur
usually #4 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Richard Lane
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
Russell Coffey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Taylor Lyle
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
Todd Gorrell
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Vijay Saki
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jordan Yeiser
6W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Justin Ross
14W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Andrew Knight
2W–6L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
DL Holland
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Headley Butler
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
J Peter Cassidy
11W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Lear
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Onur Camur
0W–8L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Lane
4W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Russell Coffey
1W–5L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Taylor Lyle
2W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Todd Gorrell
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vijay Saki
0W–8L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.