Teams

SOAKS ROTHERMEL

2022 FW Adult League - Ladies 40 Winter · Sunday Ladies 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.12 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Sunday Ladies 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Rachel Gralapp
published
3.30
Kista Stahl
published
3.29
Terri Wren
published
3.29
Vanessa Charette
published
3.27
Katherine Chu
published
3.26
Julie Ratino
published
3.20
Stacy Hamilton
published
3.15
Beth Beckwith
published 3.5
3.13
Shannon Mulroy
published
3.10
Stacy Burdick
published
3.08
Tandra Langford
published
3.04
Lynn Rasmussen
published
3.01
Tricia Spann
published
2.92
2.86
Angela Snow
published 3
2.77
Cindy Aldrete
published 3
2.75
Vickie Brannen
published
Marsha Rothermel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katherine Chu + Tandra Langford4160% games+15.3% vs expected
Tandra Langford + Beth Beckwith213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Gralapp
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Kista Stahl
20W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Terri Wren
8W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Vanessa Charette
15W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Katherine Chu
21W–13L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Julie Ratino
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
Stacy Hamilton
11W–12L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.20
3.5
Beth Beckwith
12W–14L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Shannon Mulroy
31W–29L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.13
Stacy Burdick
18W–28L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10
Tandra Langford
19W–18L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.08
Lynn Rasmussen
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
Tricia Spann
28W–25L career · no lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Bernestine Knight
26W–47L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Angela Snow
28W–54L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Cindy Aldrete
29W–33L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
Vickie Brannen
11W–13L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Marsha Rothermel
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.