Teams

Bent Creek - Holbein

2026 Central Penn Tri-Level League · Mens Low Tri Level League (3.0-3.5-4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.30 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Mens Low Tri Level League (3.0-3.5-4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Alex Kauffman
published 4
3.48
Pahn Sisay
published 3.5
3.47
Shane Holbein
published 4
3.23
David Stoudt
published 3.5
3.04
Benjamin Atwater
published 3
2.97
Michael Schmid
published
2.94
Joao Rodrigues
published
2.84
Brian Schama
published 3
2.76
Bob Pozesky
published 3
2.76
Brian Cronin
published 3
2.73
Daniel Reese
published 3
2.67
Chris Kelleher
published 3
John Mcintyre
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Reese + Michael Schmid3643% games−5.8% vs expected
Pahn Sisay + Michael Schmid224 matchesnot enough data
Shane Holbein + Alex Kauffman123 matchesnot enough data
Benjamin Atwater + Brian Schama213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alex Kauffman
38W–32L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.64
3.5
Pahn Sisay
101W–94L career · no lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.48
4
Shane Holbein
44W–56L career · no lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
David Stoudt
3W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3
Benjamin Atwater
14W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
Michael Schmid
91W–107L career · no lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.97
Joao Rodrigues
11W–17L career · no lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Brian Schama
7W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Bob Pozesky
1W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2026
3%92%4%
2.76
3
Brian Cronin
4W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Daniel Reese
77W–152L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Chris Kelleher
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
12%88%1%
2.67
John Mcintyre
2W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.