Teams

KY/BG/STENGER

ADULT 18 & OVER · 3.0 BG

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-05-11vs KY/SOM/BALLLost 03
L#1 DoublesRohan Parekh / Jeff Hunt vs Michael Paulson / Elijah Adkisson6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJames Lacock / Scott Harris vs Kyle Ball / Cyrus Adkisson2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesHank Jesse / Aaron Varrone vs Jimmie Caudill / Philip Nunn5-7, 2-6
2024-05-11vs KY/SOM/BALLLost 13
L#1 DoublesRohan Parekh / Jeff Hunt vs Jimmie Caudill / Philip Nunn0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesHank Jesse vs Camden Tackett3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJames Lacock / Scott Harris vs Michael Paulson / Elijah Adkisson6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesAaron Varrone vs Kyle Ball1-6, 2-6
2024-04-27vs KY/SOM/BALLWon 50
W#1 DoublesTimothy Davis / Ralph Gonzalez vs Philip Nunn / Chaz McGuire6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesCarl Coffey vs Kyle Ball6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesTim Stevenson / Scott Harris vs Cyrus Adkisson / Michael Paulson6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRana Pasham vs Camden Tackett7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesThad Stenger / Dakota Campbell vs James England / Elijah Adkisson6-0, 6-1
2024-04-27vs KY/SOM/BALLWon 50
W#1 DoublesTimothy Davis / Ralph Gonzalez vs Philip Nunn / Chaz McGuire6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesRana Pasham vs Kyle Ball6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesThad Stenger / Dakota Campbell vs Cyrus Adkisson / Michael Paulson6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAaron Varrone vs Camden Tackett4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTim Stevenson / James Lacock vs James England / Elijah Adkisson6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 BG
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/BG/STENGER2214614135
2KY/SOM/BALL2261428198

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Timothy Davis
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Aaron Varrone
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Carl Coffey
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Hank Jesse
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.72
James Lacock
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Dakota Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.69
Thad Stenger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.61
Jeff Hunt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Rohan Parekh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Ralph Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rana Pasham
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Tim Stevenson
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Timothy Davis
10W–8L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Aaron Varrone
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Carl Coffey
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3
Hank Jesse
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
James Lacock
5W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Dakota Campbell
5W–5L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%93%1%
2.71
Thad Stenger
6W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
2.69
Jeff Hunt
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
2.61
Rohan Parekh
1W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
2.57
Ralph Gonzalez
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
2.43
Rana Pasham
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tim Stevenson
5W–8L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.