Teams

PW.Ray

2023 CTRL Adult 55 & Over · Adult 55 & Over 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-05vs TOC TerjesenLost 02
L#1 DoublesHarriet Wilson / Meg McDevitt vs Gillian Kelleher / Sara Wilhelmy4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPatti Hulbert / Colleen Foy vs Julie Brigham / Ellen Osbourne1-6, 2-6
2023-05-04vs PW.MartinLost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Durand / Harriet Wilson vs Kathryn Stone / Kim Ledlow2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJulie Randle / Patti Hulbert vs Leah Lee / Molly Grundner1-6, 1-6
2023-04-20vs TOC.ThioLost 01
L#1 DoublesMeg McDevitt / Harriet Wilson vs Shirley Kim / Cyndy Fettig1-6, 5-7
2023-04-13vs LOCH.LeBlancWon 10
W#2 DoublesHarriet Wilson / Elise Steagall vs Susan Hoffman / Richelle Robinson6-2, 6-3
2023-03-23vs PW.FitzgeraldLost 01
L#3 DoublesJulie Randle / Patti Hulbert vs Marylynn Fitzgerald / Lisa Allen6-7, 4-6
2023-03-22vs TOC.CampbellLost 01
L#3 DoublesPatti Hulbert / Julie Randle vs Debbie Zaccardelli / Linda Kearns3-6, 2-6
2023-03-09vs KF.EvansLost 01
L#3 DoublesPatti Hulbert / Colleen Foy vs Legare Woods / Bracha Blanc4-6, 1-6
2023-02-23Won 10
W#3 DoublesJulie Randle / Patti Hulbert vs Chantal Donaghy / Melissa McCullough6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Julie Durand
published
3.35
Meg McDevitt
published
3.32
Carolyn Hidalgo
published 3.5
3.27
Jennifer Hensley
published
3.09
Mary Ott
published
3.02
Harriet Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.93
Julie Randle
published
2.40
Patti Hulbert
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
Elise Steagall
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patti Hulbert + Harriet Wilson134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Durand
16W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.43
Meg McDevitt
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
86%14%<1%
3.35
3.5
Carolyn Hidalgo
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Jennifer Hensley
13W–17L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Mary Ott
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%26%74%
3.09
3
Harriet Wilson
66W–119L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.02
Julie Randle
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
2.93
3
Patti Hulbert
39W–111L career · 6 lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
2.40
Elise Steagall
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.