Teams

West Homewood - Haines/Brignac

2022 B'ham Tri-Level Weeknight - 18 & Over Women · 4.0,3.5,3.0 Women Monday

11 players · average NTRP 3.80 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0,3.5,3.0 Women Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Anne Matthews
published 4.5
3.89
Maggie Misner
published 4
3.75
Mary Haines
published
3.73
Kathleen Stallings
published
3.68
Amber Vaughn
published 4
3.63
Margaret Lacey
published
3.38
Emily Lambert
published 3.5
3.17
Kelly Lowery
published
2.59
Haley Brignac
published 3
2.52
Victoria Hastings
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Matthews + Maggie Misner2350% gamesnot enough data
Anne Matthews + Kathleen Stallings224 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Stallings + Maggie Misner303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anne Matthews
14W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
4.29
4
Maggie Misner
77W–36L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.89
Mary Haines
18W–13L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Kathleen Stallings
16W–9L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Amber Vaughn
18W–18L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Margaret Lacey
52W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%16%84%
3.63
Kyndall Spooner Robbins
52W–24L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Emily Lambert
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kelly Lowery
22W–34L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Haley Brignac
9W–15L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
2.59
Victoria Hastings
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.