Teams

Racq Pack

2025 Prince Georges Adult 18 & Over · Prince Georges Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-07vs Blazing Dodgers 3.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Wang / Steven Gibau vs Hyunjae Jeon / Tyrone D'angelis2-6, 2-6
2025-05-31Won 10
W#2 DoublesMajed Hamawy / Steven Gibau vs Fletcher James / Bill Keating6-3, 5-4
2025-05-21vs Blazing Dodgers 3.5Split 11
W#2 DoublesTerry Tate / Steven Gibau vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesOlugbenga Okubadejo / Mark Wang vs Ping-Jung Liu / Alexis Villagran1-6, 2-6
2025-05-10vs Blazing Dodgers 3.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSteven Gibau / Mark Wang vs Ali Hamdani / Tyrone D'angelis3-6, 1-6
2025-05-04vs RacqueteersLost 01
L#1 DoublesSteven Gibau / Larry McCollum vs Timothy Murphy / Xavier Rouse3-6, 5-7
2025-04-20vs RacqueteersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesOlugbenga Okubadejo / Mark Wang vs Matt Dale / Bahaa Ghammraoui6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRon Best / Steven Gibau vs DONG YOON SHIN / Jesse Brooks7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince Georges Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Terry Tate
published
3.39
Olugbenga Okubadejo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.37
Shawn Drury
published
3.34
Ron Best
published
3.29
Mark Wang
published
3.12
Mervin Dennis
published
3.03
Steven Gibau
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Majed Hamawy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Larry McCollum
published
Ian Jones
published
Segun Eubanks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Gibau + Olugbenga Okubadejo2545% gamesnot enough data
Steven Gibau + Ron Best123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Terry Tate
41W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Olugbenga Okubadejo
256W–209L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Shawn Drury
41W–35L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
Ron Best
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Mark Wang
11W–15L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Mervin Dennis
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Steven Gibau
167W–242L career · 6 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Majed Hamawy
379W–516L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Larry McCollum
7W–24L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Diana Williams Gibau
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ian Jones
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Segun Eubanks
6W–22L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.