Teams

KTravis-HR

2026 Eno River Singles 40 & Over · 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Women Evening

9 players · average NTRP 3.29 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-06vs MLong-DURWon 21
W#1 SinglesLisa Hsu vs Mary Macdonald6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKelly Travis vs Melissa Daubert6-3, 6-3
L#3 SinglesSara Lawrence vs Joan St Laurent6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2026-06-29vs KMcWhorter-HVCCLost 12
L#1 SinglesGayathri Rajaraman vs Anne Confer1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesLindsay Stanek vs Amy Herman0-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesPilneyo Seo vs Lora Alkhawam6-4, 2-0
2026-06-15vs CMurray-HRLost 12
L#1 SinglesPilneyo Seo vs Rhiannon Ludington6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesGayathri Rajaraman vs Jennifer Dunlap3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 SinglesKim Cabelka vs CLARE MURRAY6-2, 6-3
2026-06-08vs TCrowley-CHTCWon 30
W#1 SinglesLisa Hsu vs Joelle Permutt7-6, 6-2
W#2 SinglesSara Lawrence vs Ai-Jiuan Wu6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesKim Cabelka vs Destiny Lopez7-5, 6-4
2026-06-01vs KLaan-DURLost 12
L#1 SinglesAbigail Hatcher vs Karli Eller5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLindsay Stanek vs Hannah White4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 SinglesKaren Sonders vs Kinsey Wennerstrom2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-18vs GLoFrese-TOCHWon 21
L#1 SinglesPilneyo Seo vs Kellianne White6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesLisa Hsu vs Leslie Jackson6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesKim Cabelka vs Becki Cleveland6-0, 6-4
2026-05-08vs CMurray-HRWon 30
W#1 SinglesKaren Sonders vs Rhiannon Ludington6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAbigail Hatcher vs Jennifer Dunlap6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesGayathri Rajaraman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-05vs KMcWhorter-HVCCWon 21
L#1 SinglesLindsay Stanek vs Lora Alkhawam4-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesKelly Travis vs Cecily Peterson6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesGayathri Rajaraman vs Kelly Moore6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Women Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KTravis-HR5315921167
2GLoFrese-TOCH44141024188
3TCrowley-CHTC1751940254

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Abigail Hatcher
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Lindsay Stanek
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Pilneyo Seo
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.22
Karen Sonders
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
3.20
Kelly Travis
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.18
Lisa Hsu
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Gayathri Rajaraman
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.05
Sara Lawrence
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.94
Kim Cabelka
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Travis + Abigail Hatcher123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Abigail Hatcher
23W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Lindsay Stanek
114W–82L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.38
Pilneyo Seo
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.37
3
Karen Sonders
50W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.22
Kelly Travis
20W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Lisa Hsu
91W–91L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Gayathri Rajaraman
55W–63L career · 4 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
3
Sara Lawrence
160W–120L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.05
3
Kim Cabelka
89W–93L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.