Teams

Huffhines/Huffman-James W4.0T

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

20 players · average NTRP 3.81 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-06-11vs Greenhill/Newberg-Schonwald W4.0TWon 10
W#1 DoublesSue Lopez de Correia / Kristie Shorey vs Elizabeth Chao / Brooke Reese7-5, 7-5
2026-05-28vs Chandlers Landing/Owenby W4.0TSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSue Lopez de Correia / Kristie Shorey vs Dana Johnson / Leslie Oelke6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCookie Steel / Ann Liu vs Emily Laurence / Lauren Oelke1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Sue Lopez de Correia
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.86
Charlotte Rice
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.77
Kristie Shorey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Carrie Hoogendoorn
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.71
Alissa McKinney
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Molly Pruner
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.63
Jennifer Huffman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.60
Angela James
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.55
Cookie Steel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Sophie Nini
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.45
Amelia White
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.45
Karen Saland
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.44
Becky Connet
usually #2 Singles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.44
Ann Liu
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.34
Mary Hannah Robinson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.09
Nancy McGuire
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Elizabeth Lindberg
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Gianna Cerullo
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Singles 38% · published
Kimberly Hart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Samantha Calderon
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly Pruner + Carrie Hoogendoorn311854% games−0.4% vs expected
Becky Connet + Ann Liu044 matchesnot enough data
Ann Liu + Sophie Nini044 matchesnot enough data
Kristie Shorey + Alissa McKinney213 matchesnot enough data
Charlotte Rice + Angela James213 matchesnot enough data
Angela James + Ann Liu123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sue Lopez de Correia
27W–11L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.95
4
Charlotte Rice
15W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.86
Kristie Shorey
13W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Carrie Hoogendoorn
32W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Alissa McKinney
16W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
Molly Pruner
32W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
Jennifer Huffman
3W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.63
4
Angela James
16W–16L career · 7 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Cookie Steel
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.55
Sophie Nini
4W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Amelia White
14W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.45
Karen Saland
11W–15L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Becky Connet
42W–34L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Ann Liu
5W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
Mary Hannah Robinson
20W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Nancy McGuire
6W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
25%74%<1%
3.09
Elizabeth Lindberg
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Gianna Cerullo
8W–11L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kimberly Hart
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Samantha Calderon
8W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.