Teams

EW-CBRC-Knox

2025 Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 WOMEN

11 players · average NTRP 3.92 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-13vs YTC - MorrisonLost 12
L#1 DoublesElaine Kelley / Gail Sears vs Marlaine Moore / Barbara Kinloch5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMarjorie Petersen / Joann Bunch vs Pauli Martin / Janet Owen5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCyd Bothum / Rise Hawley vs Susan Morrison / TERESA FOSSUM6-1, 6-1
2025-04-12vs YTC - MorrisonWon 20
W#1 DoublesRise Hawley / Judy Knox vs Marlaine Moore / Janet Owen6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMarjorie Petersen / Earline Millsaps vs Lori Nicol / TERESA FOSSUM6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-11vs YTC - MorrisonWon 21
W#1 DoublesJudy Knox / Rise Hawley vs Barbara Kinloch / Marlaine Moore6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMarjorie Petersen / Earline Millsaps vs Lori Nicol / TERESA FOSSUM4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElaine Kelley / Paula Davis-Vedder vs Pauli Martin / Susan Morrison6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Rise Hawley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.88
Judy Knox
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Elaine Kelley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Cyd Bothum
published 4
3.66
Marie Fitzpatrick
published
3.30
Paula Davis-Vedder
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Victoria Smoot
published 3.5
Earline Millsaps
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Gail Sears
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Joann Bunch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Marjorie Petersen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rise Hawley + Judy Knox25758% games+5.4% vs expected
Marjorie Petersen + Judy Knox11652% games−1.5% vs expected
Earline Millsaps + Marjorie Petersen7949% gamesnot enough data
Elaine Kelley + Gail Sears7452% gamesnot enough data
Elaine Kelley + Paula Davis-Vedder3358% gamesnot enough data
Gail Sears + Victoria Smoot123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rise Hawley
112W–72L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
3.90
4
Judy Knox
45W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
4.5
Elaine Kelley
47W–55L career · 2 lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
3.80
4
Cyd Bothum
2W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marie Fitzpatrick
18W–19L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.66
3.5
Paula Davis-Vedder
54W–61L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Victoria Smoot
70W–58L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Earline Millsaps
17W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gail Sears
20W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joann Bunch
12W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marjorie Petersen
40W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.