Teams

B TDC Long

2024 Richmond Adult 55 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Weekday Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-26vs C ACAC LockhartLost 01
L#3 DoublesHeidi Collier / Kumiko Suzuki vs Robin Petrine / Anne Townsend1-6, 2-6
2024-07-15vs K 7.0 MTC DowningWon 10
W#1 DoublesHeidi Collier / Stephanie Marcus vs Marilyn Downing / Norma Kimbrel6-2, 6-1
2024-07-08vs I Westwood TowlerWon 10
W#1 DoublesHeidi Collier / Susan Long vs Margaret Kohler / Kathryn Gray6-4, 6-0
2024-07-01vs Mid-Atlantic/Cooper/55&Over7.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesSheri Carlyle / Heidi Collier vs Shannon Webb / Lisa Harmon2-6, 4-6
2024-06-24vs D Hermitage HarcumWon 10
W#3 DoublesHeidi Collier / Michele Limoges vs Cheryl Law / Jennifer Polk6-1, 6-1
2024-06-17vs A ACAC NeumannLost 01
L#1 DoublesHeidi Collier / Sheri Carlyle vs Paula Bissett / Beth Farnsworth6-0, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Weekday Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Nancy Price
published
3.35
Heidi Collier
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Sharon Moorefield
published
Cris Latief
published 3.5
3.17
Nathalie Stephens
published
3.16
Cynthia Mistretta
published 3.5
3.12
Sheri Carlyle
published
3.05
Michele Limoges
published
2.90
Kumiko Suzuki
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheri Carlyle + Heidi Collier404 matchesnot enough data
Sheri Carlyle + Michele Limoges123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Price
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.81
3.5
Heidi Collier
118W–81L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
Sharon Moorefield
19W–18L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Cris Latief
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nathalie Stephens
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Cynthia Mistretta
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
Sheri Carlyle
17W–10L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.12
Michele Limoges
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.05
Kumiko Suzuki
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.