Teams

McManus (FWBTC)

2023 OWB Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_1

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#2 DoublesMikaela McManus / Van Hughes vs Dianna Dylewski / Flavia Elizabeth de Medeiros Cerny7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2023-12-04vs Stowers (BlueWater Bay)Won 10
W#3 DoublesMikaela McManus / Van Hughes vs Andrea Moneymaker / Allison Phillips6-1, 6-3
2023-11-08vs Stowers (BlueWater Bay)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMikaela McManus / Dodi Stringfellow vs Jolyn Curtis / TRACY STOWERS6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2023-11-04vs Okalossa/Garfield/Combo18&Over7.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesMikaela McManus / Sophie Rudman vs Moya Peterson / Jennifer Schweikert6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-10-30vs Stowers (BlueWater Bay)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMikaela McManus / Kris Pritchard vs Kristie Edwards / Stephanie Westbrook4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Mikaela McManus
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.47
Flavia Elizabeth de Medeiros Cerny
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.25
Madison Butcher
published
3.23
Christy Butcher
published 3.5
3.08
Sheri Clancy
published
3.05
Cheryll Myers
published 3.5
2.87
Mayumi Kosnosky
published
Julie Cotton
published
Paige Young
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christy Butcher + Madison Butcher314 matchesnot enough data
Mayumi Kosnosky + Cheryll Myers224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mikaela McManus
81W–44L career · 5 lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
3.91
4
Flavia Elizabeth de Medeiros Cerny
60W–41L career · 7 lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
3.47
Madison Butcher
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Christy Butcher
16W–15L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Sheri Clancy
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Cheryll Myers
12W–10L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.05
Mayumi Kosnosky
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.87
Julie Cotton
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Paige Young
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.