Teams

GOLDMAN TC 18AM4.0B

2024 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 DoublesChristopher Phan / Patrick Mabry vs Scott Schafebook / Arnold Varilla1-0
2024-06-01vs FREMONT TC 18AM4.0CWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristopher Phan / John Santos vs Pushkar Kalamkar / Vindhesh Singh7-6, 6-2
2024-05-19vs Bay Club Fremont 18AM4.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesChristopher Phan / Steve Lhi vs Shang Liu / Arnold Soleta3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesChristopher Phan / David Luu vs Steven Lehmer / Vikram Kadi6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2024-04-30vs FREMONT TC 18AM4.0AWon 10
W#3 DoublesChristopher Phan / David Luu vs Nihaar Jajoo / Arpit Kumar6-2, 6-1
2024-04-28vs BAY TREES PK 18AM4.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesKent Byun / Christopher Phan vs Gabriel Chan / Benjamin Yan7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2024-04-27vs FREMONT TC 18AM4.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristopher Phan / John Santos vs Arpit Kumar / Ravi Subbarayan6-0, 6-3
2024-04-19vs BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 18AM4.0CWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristopher Phan / Dan Tu vs Andrew Ho / Leonard Chang6-3, 7-6
2024-04-10vs GOLDMAN TC 18AM4.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesChristopher Phan / Dan Tu vs Anthony Ciccone / Jason Lerner6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Patrick Mabry
published
4.19
Kent Byun
published
4.08
Christopher Phan
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 4.5
4.08
Yu Ning Yu
published
3.93
Sam Finegold
published
3.77
Jonathan Cheung
published
3.75
David Reel
published 4
3.75
Dan Tu
published 4
3.71
Michael Gross
published
3.70
Dalton Lobo Dias
published 3.5
3.60
Alexander Hsieh
published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patrick Mabry
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
4.36
Kent Byun
15W–15L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Christopher Phan
68W–42L career · 13 lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
4.08
Yu Ning Yu
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
4.08
Sam Finegold
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.93
Jonathan Cheung
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
David Reel
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Dan Tu
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Michael Gross
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
98%2%<1%
3.71
3.5
Dalton Lobo Dias
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%7%93%
3.70
4
Alexander Hsieh
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.