Teams

Clapp/Nashville

2025 Mixed 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.5 Mixed - Saturday

14 players · average NTRP 3.62 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-26vs Feyes/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesKara Geiger / Devin Haneline vs Anna Hall / Michael Ellsworth1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKRISTA Hatchett / William Hatchett vs Shari Glickman / Aaron Farris6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGeorgia Ferrell / Benjamin Ferrell vs Heather Brandon / Nicholas Yglesias1-6, 3-6
2025-06-28vs Feyes/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesMatt Pietsch / Catherine Pietsch vs Michael Ellsworth / Jennifer Thomas3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBenjamin Ferrell / Georgia Ferrell vs Nicolas Tempels / Courtney Fraser-Mason3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAdam Marrale / Ashley West vs Nicholas Yglesias / Heather Brandon1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Mixed - Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Benjamin Ferrell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
William Hatchett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Isaiah Butler
published
3.55
Joshua Morris
published
3.53
KRISTA Hatchett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Heidi van Ameringen
published
3.47
Catherine Pietsch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Devin Haneline
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Kara Geiger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Kelly Clapp
published
3.29
Adam Marrale
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Matt Pietsch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Georgia Ferrell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Whitney Rice
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

KRISTA Hatchett + William Hatchett8267% games+2.1% vs expected
Devin Haneline + Heidi van Ameringen314 matchesnot enough data
Heidi van Ameringen + Joshua Morris213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Benjamin Ferrell
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
William Hatchett
20W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.70
Isaiah Butler
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Joshua Morris
12W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.55
KRISTA Hatchett
33W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.53
Heidi van Ameringen
22W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Catherine Pietsch
34W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Devin Haneline
17W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Kara Geiger
21W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.36
Kelly Clapp
30W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.35
3.5
Adam Marrale
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Matt Pietsch
1W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
Georgia Ferrell
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Whitney Rice
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.