Teams

Clark/2.5/18&O/Ruston/RPAR

2025 Ruston Adult 18 & Over - Women · 2.5 Ruston (18&O) Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-04vs Shirley/2.5/18&O/Ruston/RPARLost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Clark / Tatum Mitchell vs Taylor Richardson Burt / Michelle Landry1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAmanda Sutherland / Tonya McCulloch vs Joan McMaster / Julie Shirley1-6, 1-6
2025-04-27vs Shirley/2.5/18&O/Ruston/RPARSplit 11
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Clark / Tatum Mitchell vs Cassandra Huneycutt / Ashley Allen1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesKelley Ivey vs Krystal Bearden6-1, 6-0
2025-04-13vs Shirley/2.5/18&O/Ruston/RPARLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaura Hartt / Amanda Sutherland vs Joan McMaster / Ashley Allen0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEva Johnston / Anna Garmon vs Regina McNeill / Michelle Landry2-6, 5-7
2025-03-30vs Shirley/2.5/18&O/Ruston/RPARWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmanda Sutherland / Tonya McCulloch vs Michelle Landry / Taylor Richardson Burt1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKelley Ivey vs Joan McMaster6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTatum Mitchell / Eva Johnston vs Cassandra Huneycutt / Jennifer Garriga6-3, 6-4
2025-03-23vs Shirley/2.5/18&O/Ruston/RPARLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnna Bates / Kelley Ivey vs Joan McMaster / Cassandra Huneycutt3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLaura Hartt vs Krystal Bearden3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTonya McCulloch / Elizabeth Clark vs Julie Shirley / Jennifer Garriga5-7, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Ruston (18&O) Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.46
Kelley Ivey
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.44
Eva Johnston
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Anna Bates
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Anna Garmon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Laura Hartt
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Tatum Mitchell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tonya McCulloch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelley Ivey
7W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.46
Eva Johnston
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.44
2.5
Anna Bates
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Anna Garmon
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Laura Hartt
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tatum Mitchell
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tonya McCulloch
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.