Teams

MVC Smith SSL A18-4.0M

2024 WMI SSL USTA League Adult 18&Over Weekend Leagues · WMI SSL A18&O 4.0 M (8 player)

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-05-04vs PA Bont SSL A18-4.0MLost 23
W#1 DoublesChris Grashorn / Benjamin Acevedo vs Harrison Malone / Jack Ponstine7-5, 6-0
L#1 SinglesMatthew Weiden vs Nathan Kunnen4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJacob Widgren / Robert Pearson vs Steven Deroos / Ron Patrick2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesNathaniel Smith vs Patrick Mullan3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRob Reyers / Joseph Fugitt vs Mark Wagley / Thomas Price6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-02-24vs MSU Dillinger SSL A18-4.0MLost 04
L#1 DoublesRob Reyers / Matthew Weiden vs Christopher Cuyar / Sergey Ilyashov3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChris Grashorn / Rob Campbell vs Jared Stratz / Michael Gonzales2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesDavid Tenney vs Raju Pusapati4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJoseph Fugitt / Nathaniel Smith vs Zachary Dillinger / John Nelligan2-6, 4-6
2024-02-10vs PA Tjalsma SSL A18-4.0MLost 13
L#1 DoublesChris Grashorn / Matthew Weiden vs Tyler Fedewa / Ryan Peters6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoseph Fugitt / Rob Reyers vs Casey Tjalsma / Justin Rausch2-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesBenjamin Acevedo vs Tyler Hough4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRobert Lotzar / GEORGE CHANG vs Eric Dreisbach / Brian Cutler4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WMI SSL A18&O 4.0 M (8 player) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Benjamin Acevedo
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.77
Matthew Weiden
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.76
Chris Grashorn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Robert Lotzar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
GEORGE CHANG
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Rob Reyers
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.60
Joseph Fugitt
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.58
Nathaniel Smith
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.51
Robert Pearson
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.50
Eric Starke
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.35
Alex Zhong
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.34
Jason Tenace
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
David Tenney
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Jacob Widgren
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nathaniel Smith + Rob Reyers4256% games+8.6% vs expected
Chris Grashorn + Benjamin Acevedo4159% games+6.6% vs expected
Chris Grashorn + Matthew Weiden2648% games+0.3% vs expected
GEORGE CHANG + Robert Lotzar3552% games−6.6% vs expected
Jacob Widgren + Robert Pearson224 matchesnot enough data
GEORGE CHANG + Nathaniel Smith224 matchesnot enough data
Robert Lotzar + Matthew Weiden314 matchesnot enough data
Robert Lotzar + Joseph Fugitt213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Benjamin Acevedo
14W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.88
Matthew Weiden
10W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Chris Grashorn
24W–24L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
Robert Lotzar
38W–30L career · 1 line in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
GEORGE CHANG
92W–83L career · 1 line in 2024
15%85%1%
3.65
Rob Reyers
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
Joseph Fugitt
13W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
24%75%<1%
3.60
Nathaniel Smith
54W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.58
Robert Pearson
48W–25L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.51
Eric Starke
25W–15L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Alex Zhong
23W–24L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%86%14%
3.35
Jason Tenace
58W–30L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
David Tenney
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Jacob Widgren
7W–10L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.