Teams

Wong/Jordan

2025 Tri-Level Metro · 3.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.81 / METROPOLITAN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-25vs Balls OutWon 21
L#1 DoublesTeppei Suzuki / Michael Zhao vs Arthur Hainline / Andrew Murano3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRains Jordan / Takahiro Fushimi vs Tariq Habib / Matthew Kennis6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGabriel Birman / Henry Sandberg vs Thomas Rinaldi / Thomas Artaki2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-11-20vs JhaveriWon 30
W#1 DoublesSamuel Ping / Lawrence Wang vs Andrew Abell / Jake Bowling6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTakahiro Fushimi / Felix Wang vs Edward Park / Edward Forward6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesGabriel Birman / Patrick Luib vs Amish Jhaveri / Neil Goodman6-2, 6-2
2025-11-10vs Romano/LeeWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Zhao / Moritz Weigl vs Adam Jaskowski / Glenn Wortman6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJulian Laird / Felix Wang vs Horatio Wildman / Evan Wells6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesScott Spitze / Sam Zalutsky vs Jon Bachrach / Jonathan Piccirillo6-4, 6-1
2025-11-04vs HirshWon 30
W#1 DoublesSamuel Ping / Moritz Weigl vs Mitchell Low / Danny Tocco6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRoni Dotan / Maxwell Payson vs Jonathan Liu / Gustavo Fernandez Ranvier2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHenry Sandberg / Gabriel Birman vs Ashwin Venkat / Craig Knittle6-3, 7-5
2025-10-21vs SiasWon 30
W#1 DoublesLawrence Wang / Teppei Suzuki vs Evan Low / Andrew Stephenson6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJulian Laird / Ryan Lee vs Nam Nguyen / William Loh6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCharlie Denhart / Scott Spitze vs David Packer / William Packer6-1, 6-2
2025-10-16vs Metro: ExcelsiorLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael Zhao / Samuel Ping vs Cosmo Amabile / Patrick Knise7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRyan Lee / Maxwell Payson vs Alex Du / Eric Bomgardner2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPatrick Luib / Henry Sandberg vs Bradley Faskowitz / Anh Nguyen1-6, 4-6
2025-10-07vs ChoyWon 30
W#1 DoublesSamuel Ping / Teppei Suzuki vs Michael Trainer / Peter Daly6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesWilliam Bartlett / Julian Laird vs Rob Montgomery / Kell Cahoon6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPatrick Luib / Scott Spitze vs Simon Wu / Bradley Hochwald6-3, 6-4
2025-09-21vs Mekles/MurphyLost 02
L#1 DoublesLawrence Wang / Moritz Weigl vs Ananth Mohan / Marcos Rocca6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSam Zalutsky / Conrado Brenna vs Isaac Halpern / Matthew Maycock3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Lawrence Wang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.41
Teppei Suzuki
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.26
Samuel Ping
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.00
Julian Laird
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.98
Ryan Lee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.83
Roni Dotan
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.80
Winson Wong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Felix Wang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Henry Sandberg
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.46
Scott Spitze
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.43
Gabriel Birman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Conrado Brenna
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Patrick Luib
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
2.90
Sam Zalutsky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Maxwell Payson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Zhao
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Moritz Weigl
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Rains Jordan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Takahiro Fushimi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Luib + Roni Dotan5163% games+8.2% vs expected
Sam Zalutsky + Roni Dotan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lawrence Wang
19W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
4.48
4.5
Teppei Suzuki
62W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
4.41
Samuel Ping
20W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
4.26
Julian Laird
40W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
4.00
Ryan Lee
46W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Roni Dotan
125W–89L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Winson Wong
86W–77L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Felix Wang
9W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Henry Sandberg
48W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
Scott Spitze
13W–4L career · 7 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Gabriel Birman
23W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Conrado Brenna
0W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Patrick Luib
109W–106L career · 7 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Sam Zalutsky
27W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.90
Maxwell Payson
22W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Zhao
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Moritz Weigl
13W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rains Jordan
32W–41L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Takahiro Fushimi
13W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.