Teams

SDNC 3.5WE Kit Carson Park/ Nelson

2022 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SDNC WE Women · SDNC - Women- WE 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-12vs SDNC 3.5WE RPTC/ ChenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCharis Ioannides / Emily Adamiec vs Junli Feng / Tomoko Hoffman6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDonna Tucker / Mercedes Cadiz vs Liz Perkins / Denise Wilson0-6, 4-6
2022-06-05vs SDNC 3.5WE Winner's TC/ PretiSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCharis Ioannides / Emily Adamiec vs Elena Gilmor / Crista Hubbard3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChristi McClain / Judy Nelson vs Heidi Ulrich / Sara Cheng6-3, 6-4
W#1 DoublesMercedes Cadiz / Judy Nelson vs Rebecca Walsh / Mimi Mulligan6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesAmie Destremps vs Jill Narlock6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesHeidi Dalvie / Amie Destremps vs Hillary Emery / Lindsey Harp2-6, 6-7
2022-05-08vs SDNC 3.5WE RPTC/ ChenWon 10
W#2 DoublesMercedes Cadiz / Heather Ward vs Ping Chen / Julie Islitzer6-1, 6-4
2022-05-01vs SDNC 3.5WE Winner's TC/ PretiWon 10
W#2 DoublesChristi McClain / Judy Nelson vs Mary Jo Preti / Sara Cheng7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAmie Destremps vs Jill Narlock6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHeather Ward / Emily Adamiec vs Lori Kartsub / Sheryl Nelson6-4, 6-3
L#1 DoublesHeidi Dalvie / Mercedes Cadiz vs Lindsey Harp / Leeza Pierce6-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAmie Destremps vs Jennifer Caringal6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women- WE 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Christi McClain
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Sun Lee
published
3.37
Amie Destremps
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.31
Emily Adamiec
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Heather Ward
published 3.5
3.13
Heidi Dalvie
published 3.5
3.00
Vinka Valdivia
published
2.95
Donna Tucker
published 3.5
Mercedes Cadiz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christi McClain
111W–48L career · 3 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.64
Sun Lee
18W–20L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.52
4
Amie Destremps
43W–51L career · 4 lines in 2022
83%17%<1%
3.37
3.5
Emily Adamiec
67W–51L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Heather Ward
12W–12L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Heidi Dalvie
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
Vinka Valdivia
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.00
3.5
Donna Tucker
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
2.95
Mercedes Cadiz
55W–80L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.