Teams

Douglas/Knoxville

2025 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League-Knoxville · 4.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-13vs Cooper-Simpson/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesAbigail Osborne / Laura Wolfe vs Terryann Nelson / Jennifer Johnson6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMARISA GRAHAM / HAILEY NEDS vs Melissa Kirby / Holly Tucker-Vance6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTori Hayes / Stephanie Nichols vs Cheryl Cooper / Liz Mcclain4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-12-03vs Fuller Luna/ KnoxvilleWon 31
W#1 DoublesStephanie Nichols / Laura Wolfe vs Gina O'Neil / Natalie Deel6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesWhitney Liner / Kayce Drennan vs Christina Johnson / Lora Armfield6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesErin Upshaw vs Christina Sheringham6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTori Hayes / Jennifer Oakley vs Wesley Fuller / Shantel Houston6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-11-15vs Dickson 18/ES KnoxWon 50
W#1 DoublesCarrie Hayes / Emily Jenkins vs Mei Ling Gingrich / Eve Tang6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLaura Wolfe vs Correna Dickson6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJennifer Douglas / Noverly Scott vs Lynn Johnson / Margot Dunn6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMARISA GRAHAM vs Wanda Williams6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHAILEY NEDS / Deanna Unger vs Kimberly Woody / Shawni Eaker7-5, 6-1
2024-11-08vs Cooper-Simpson/KnoxvilleWon 41
W#1 DoublesNoverly Scott / Jennifer Douglas vs Lea Ann Fields / Terryann Nelson6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMARISA GRAHAM vs Jennifer Cook4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHAILEY NEDS / Paige Brown vs Marissa Turner / Margie Hensley6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 SinglesErin Upshaw vs Suzanne Miller6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCarrie Hayes / Brittany Epperly vs Stacey Bristow / Jennifer Johnson7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-11-07vs Fuller Luna/ KnoxvilleWon 41
W#1 DoublesPaige Brown / Laura Wolfe vs Gina O'Neil / Natalie Deel6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesHAILEY NEDS vs Natalie Harrison7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesErin Upshaw / Jennifer Oakley vs Michele Hall Craig / Lindsey Stimets1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesDeanna Unger vs Kristi Leach6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBrittany Epperly / Emily Jenkins vs Christina Sheringham / Pamela Shirley6-2, 7-5
2024-10-15vs Dickson 18/ES KnoxWon 21
L#2 DoublesCarrie Hayes / Erin Upshaw vs Jacque Clem / Kimberly Woody6-7, 6-7
W#2 SinglesBrittany Epperly vs Ellen Flautt6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLaura Wolfe / Noverly Scott vs Cindy Henry / Mei Ling Gingrich4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Deanna Unger
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.98
Laura Wolfe
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.83
Whitney Liner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Abigail Osborne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
HAILEY NEDS
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.80
Kayce Drennan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Brittany Epperly
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.78
Erin Upshaw
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.71
MARISA GRAHAM
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.63
Tori Hayes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Carrie Hayes
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Noverly Scott
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tori Hayes + Carrie Hayes3541% games−14.9% vs expected
MARISA GRAHAM + HAILEY NEDS4254% gamesnot enough data
Abigail Osborne + Laura Wolfe4158% gamesnot enough data
Carrie Hayes + Erin Upshaw0541% gamesnot enough data
Abigail Osborne + HAILEY NEDS404 matchesnot enough data
Kayce Drennan + Carrie Hayes314 matchesnot enough data
MARISA GRAHAM + Deanna Unger314 matchesnot enough data
Tori Hayes + MARISA GRAHAM213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Deanna Unger
26W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.98
Laura Wolfe
23W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.98
Whitney Liner
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Abigail Osborne
20W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%9%
3.81
HAILEY NEDS
20W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Kayce Drennan
14W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Brittany Epperly
12W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
Erin Upshaw
29W–20L career · 9 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
MARISA GRAHAM
22W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Tori Hayes
11W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
4
Carrie Hayes
13W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
Noverly Scott
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.