Teams

WI Adult 55&O 8.0W GML Lake Country WAC Wolf

2025 WI Adult 55 & Over · WI Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women (Eve)

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesAmy Christine Marshall / Beth Raab vs Eliza Audley / Michelle Webster4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Kryzenske / Susan Miller vs Charlotte Toboyek / Dale Sloan1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTerri Martin / Toni Flesch vs Rae Krivohlavek / Pamela Flores4-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesAmy Christine Marshall / Beth Raab vs Sara Kartz / Wendy Vernon5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJessica Early Byrnes / Sarah Griffin vs Kathy Mueller / Tina Kadrich3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesJulie Wolf / Kara Schroeder vs Lisa Ellegard / Carolyn Scott6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCarla Allsop / Lisa Kopfer vs Deanna Weiss / Susan Fondrie2-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesJessica Early Byrnes / Amy Christine Marshall vs Gordana Robey / Susan Kubichek4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Griffin / Julie Wolf vs Wendy Orthober / Lisa Kennedy1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesTerri Martin / Kathy Kryzenske vs Lisa van Ert / Laurie Pasternak6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBeth Raab / Sarah Griffin vs Jennifer Starich / Mary Whitfield6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKara Schroeder / Carla Allsop vs Deborah Linhart / Donna Rogers3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesJessica Early Byrnes / Amy Christine Marshall vs Darlene Beck / Elizabeth Feldman7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesToni Flesch / Beth Raab vs Margo Koleski / Lisa Murn6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSarah Griffin / Julie Wolf vs Catherine Curro / Patricia Wille6-7, 1-6
L#1 DoublesJessica Early Byrnes / Toni Flesch vs Mary Hansen / Judy Carlson2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSarah Griffin / Kara Schroeder vs Jean Stevens / Chris Johnson6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Miller / Beth Raab vs Ann Vogel / Pamela Evans1-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesSusan Miller / Kathy Kryzenske vs Christy Janikowski / Myrna Long4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Wolf / Lisa Kopfer vs Jean Root / Lynn Landry2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Christine Marshall / Toni Flesch vs Sarah Kyle / Nancy Krueger6-3, 6-2
W#1 DoublesBeth Raab / Jessica Early Byrnes vs Wendy Vernon / Sara Kartz6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSusan Miller / Kathy Kryzenske vs Karen Lucey / Joyce Koker3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Wolf / Kara Schroeder vs Tina Kadrich / Gina Larkin2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · WI Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women (Eve)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Adult 55&O 8.0W GML Paley Tennis Cntr Westreich812439152
2WI Adult 55&O 8.0W GML Heyer Park Stevens7222514195
3WI Adult 55&O 8.0W GML Lake Country WAC Toboyek7220719193
4WI Adult 55&O 8.0W GML Princeton Club Lambrecht54141329244
5WI Adult 55&O 8.0W GML Lake Country WAC Wolf4581941295
6WI Adult 55&O 8.0W GML North Shore Elite Fondrie36101738274
7WI Adult 55&O 8.0W GML Brookfield Elite Sanders1872040273
8WI Adult 55&O 8.0W GML Brookfield East Pasternak1832450314

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Jessica Early Byrnes
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.67
Toni Flesch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
Beth Raab
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Kathy Kryzenske
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.60
Amy Christine Marshall
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.56
Sarah Griffin
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.33
Carla Allsop
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Lisa Kopfer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Julie Wolf
published
Kara Schroeder
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Terri Martin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Kopfer + Carla Allsop6354% games+3.9% vs expected
Toni Flesch + Beth Raab5548% games−0.9% vs expected
Sarah Griffin + Carla Allsop3444% gamesnot enough data
Jessica Early Byrnes + Toni Flesch2354% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Griffin + Lisa Kopfer134 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Early Byrnes + Beth Raab314 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Early Byrnes + Amy Christine Marshall134 matchesnot enough data
Toni Flesch + Amy Christine Marshall213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jessica Early Byrnes
33W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Toni Flesch
48W–33L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.67
4
Beth Raab
34W–23L career · 6 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.65
Kathy Kryzenske
28W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Amy Christine Marshall
17W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Sarah Griffin
70W–40L career · 5 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.56
3.5
Carla Allsop
66W–56L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Lisa Kopfer
48W–46L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Julie Wolf
2W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kara Schroeder
11W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Terri Martin
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.