Teams

TNT 7.0

2023 Fredericksburg Mixed 40 & Over · Fredericksburg Mixed 40 & Over 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-24vs Tiebreakers 7.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBill Thomas / Judith Jobrack vs Hisami Bergeron / Andy Withers7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2023-07-23vs Battlefield Ball BustersLost 01
L#1 DoublesWai Lim Tse / Tanya Gossett vs Rachael Day / John Whitehead2-6, 2-6
2023-07-21vs Smart Aces 7.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Hyman / Dorota Sipko vs George Aste / Carlene Gordon6-3, 6-0
2023-07-10vs Smart Aces 7.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJudith Jobrack / Trent Billups vs Q Pennings / Robin Long2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-07-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesTrent Billups / Judith Jobrack vs Scott Fisher / Cynthia Robinson6-1, 7-5
2023-06-24vs Tiebreakers 7.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesDorota Sipko / Chris Baylor vs Linda Blakemore / Edward Rollins6-1, 6-1
2023-06-10vs Battlefield Ball BustersWon 20
W#1 DoublesAldo Villalobos / Dorota Sipko vs Rian Block / Rachael Day6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChris Baylor / Tanya Gossett vs John Whitehead / Cynthia Robinson6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fredericksburg Mixed 40 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Bill Thomas
published 4
3.51
Luis Aragon
published
3.42
Tanya Gossett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Dorota Sipko
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.01
Lisa Alpert
published
2.74
Judith Jobrack
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Pat Gillespie
published
Susan Thompson
published
Tracey Nankivel
published
Trent Billups
published
William George
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William George + Dorota Sipko5067% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bill Thomas
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Luis Aragon
13W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Tanya Gossett
39W–21L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.42
3.5
Dorota Sipko
163W–91L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Lisa Alpert
5W–13L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Judith Jobrack
72W–90L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.74
Pat Gillespie
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Thompson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tracey Nankivel
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Trent Billups
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
William George
5W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.