Teams

MBradle (Sardis)

2025 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-29vs MMackvick (Carmel)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJean Brown / Christina Drogaris vs Ashleigh Herlocker / Ashley Lang6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJessica Gaudino / Brittany Norman vs Jordan Reardon / Jillian Butler7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCourtney Lewis / Courtney Murray vs Sarah Goodwin / Landis Fuller2-6, 1-6
2025-09-22vs KWankhedkar/MWatson (Jeff Adams)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesChristy Walenczyk / Lory Cobb vs Mayleng Waston / Suzanne Galvin1-6, 2-6
2025-09-08vs MMackvick (Carmel)Won 21
W#1 DoublesChristina Drogaris / Andrea Johnson vs Ashley Lang / Melissa Mackvick7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMelanie Bradle / Deborah Smith-Shaw vs Brantley Alvey / Landis Fuller6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBrittany Norman / Kim Slusher vs Jillian Butler / Elizabeth Magan2-6, 1-6
2025-08-21vs KWankhedkar/MWatson (Jeff Adams)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristina Drogaris / Lory Cobb vs Yesol Kwon / Mayleng Waston1-6, 3-6
2025-08-20vs KWankhedkar/MWatson (Jeff Adams)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLory Cobb / Christy Walenczyk vs Linda Jo Mastrangelo / Sarah Edwards2-6, 5-7
2025-08-18vs MMackvick (Carmel)Won 10
W#2 DoublesLory Cobb / Brittany Norman vs Sehnaz Lowe / Sarah Goodwin6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.18 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.53
Deborah Smith-Shaw
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.28
Brittany Norman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.28
Christina Drogaris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Christy Walenczyk
published 2.5
Courtney Murray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.17
Melanie Bradle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.16
Jessica Gaudino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.15
Jean Brown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.03
Courtney Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.81
Lory Cobb
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Kim Slusher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Deborah Smith-Shaw
9W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
0%40%60%
2.53
2.5
Brittany Norman
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.28
2.5
Christina Drogaris
5W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.28
2.5
Christy Walenczyk
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Courtney Murray
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Melanie Bradle
7W–20L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
Jessica Gaudino
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16
Jean Brown
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.15
2.5
Courtney Lewis
3W–6L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.03
2.5
Lory Cobb
4W–23L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.81
Kim Slusher
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.