Teams

SD 3.0 Coronado TC (2:3)/ Escobedo

2024 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WD · SD - Women - 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 2.80 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-29vs SD 3.0 Balboa TC (3:2:)/ DorrosLost 01
L#3 DoublesMariana Escobedo / Karina Contreras vs Nancy Back / Sybilla Dorros1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesMariana Escobedo / Sahara C Vazquez M vs Whitney Gordon / Cory Stege6-3, 6-4
2024-04-24Won 10
W#2 DoublesMariana Escobedo / Tatiana Sotres vs Rebecca King / Jennie Vandenakker4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-04-17vs SD 3.0 Peninsula TC (3:2)/ GamaraLost 01
L#2 DoublesMariana Escobedo / Tatiana Sotres vs Janet Bergland / Andrea Evans1-6, 6-7
2024-04-10vs SD 3.0 Peninsula TC (3:2)/ MortonLost 01
L#2 DoublesMariana Escobedo / Tatiana Sotres vs Kathryn Parisi / Sharonna Wilson1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Veronica Acuna
published
2.77
Mariana Escobedo
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.75
Paola Guindi
published
Alejandra Bravo
published 3
Ana Trave
published 3
2.67
Karina Contreras
published
2.64
Kristi Gottlieb
published
2.62
Sahara C Vazquez M
published
2.56
Perla Wall
published
2.52
Tatiana Sotres
published
2.52
Laura Vargas
published
Carla Herrera
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mariana Escobedo + Veronica Acuna134 matchesnot enough data
Paola Guindi + Tatiana Sotres224 matchesnot enough data
Karina Contreras + Laura Vargas123 matchesnot enough data
Laura Vargas + Mariana Escobedo303 matchesnot enough data
Laura Vargas + Tatiana Sotres033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Veronica Acuna
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Mariana Escobedo
28W–55L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
Paola Guindi
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Alejandra Bravo
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Ana Trave
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karina Contreras
15W–7L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
2.67
Kristi Gottlieb
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
2.64
Sahara C Vazquez M
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
2.62
Perla Wall
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
2.56
Tatiana Sotres
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
2.52
Laura Vargas
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
2.52
2.5
Carla Herrera
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Daniela Urrea Salmon
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sofia Zepeda-Carranza
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.