Teams

Sawgrass - Herzfeld

2025 Duval Adult 55 & Over - Women Winter · 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-22vs Williams Y - MuehlWon 10
W#1 DoublesSherill Herzfeld / Jen Frenzel vs Susan Asher / Cecilia Collins6-4, 6-4
2025-03-08vs Duval/Welborn/55&Over8.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesDarlene Deo / Julie Barney vs Pamela Alpert / Joann Welborn5-7, 2-6
2025-02-22vs Boone Park - RoanLost 01
L#1 DoublesDarlene Deo / Sherill Herzfeld vs Jennifer Coffindaffer / Jaye Andone3-6, 4-6
2025-02-08vs Williams Y - MuehlLost 01
L#2 DoublesDarlene Deo / Kim Gibson vs Susan Asher / Cecilia Collins3-6, 5-7
2025-01-25vs Duval/Welborn/55&Over8.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesDarlene Deo / Jen Frenzel vs Jill Saig / Jan Alley6-7, 5-7
2025-01-18vs Boone Park - RoanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDarlene Deo / Terry Heard vs Jennifer Coffindaffer / Jill Jabot3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Coban / Jen Frenzel vs Jaye Andone / Terry Dale2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Darlene Deo
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.70
Sherill Herzfeld
published
3.59
Kristen Lancaster
published
3.46
Jen Frenzel
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.42
Aisling Toby
published 3.5
3.41
Alicia Sprecher
published 3.5
3.32
Mary Coban
published
3.30
Julie Barney
published
3.23
Lorrayne Carless
published
3.20
Terry Heard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lorrayne Carless + Aisling Toby3344% gamesnot enough data
Aisling Toby + Alicia Sprecher213 matchesnot enough data
Mary Coban + Julie Barney213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Darlene Deo
13W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Sherill Herzfeld
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Kristen Lancaster
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.59
Jen Frenzel
57W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.46
3.5
Aisling Toby
31W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Alicia Sprecher
11W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.41
Mary Coban
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.32
Julie Barney
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.30
Lorrayne Carless
19W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.23
Terry Heard
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.