Teams

Suss-Funky Bounce-Matheson Park

*2026 Adult 55 & Over 6.0-9.0 NoHo Women · 8.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-03-04vs Fahrmeier-WooHoos-KCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesCanan Karpiuk / Maria Luisa Locht vs Debbie Deerhake / Tammy Wambaugh3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Lou Suss / Pamela Hakes vs Lori Robertson / Cathy Graham6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2026-02-25vs Wroten-Hot Shots-Wendtwoods ParkLost 01
L#1 DoublesPamela Hakes / Mary Lou Suss vs Kelli Ross / Teresa Biehn6-7, 1-6
2026-02-22vs Fahrmeier-WooHoos-KCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaria Luisa Locht / Dona Williamson vs Elizabeth Friend / Babette Lopez2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesPamela Hakes / Kathleen Castro vs Debbie Deerhake / Cathy Graham2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMary Lou Suss / Ina Latimer vs Beth Carlson / Tammy Wambaugh3-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesMary Lou Suss / Tina Weber vs Michelle Purdy / Darci Marsh1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKathleen Castro / Pamela Hakes vs Carol Steinke / Kenita Whiteside2-6, 3-6
2026-02-05vs Fahrmeier-WooHoos-KCCLost 02
L#2 DoublesIna Latimer / Tina Weber vs Risa Cogliandro / Beth Carlson1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMary Lou Suss / Dona Williamson vs Donna Ullrich / Elizabeth Friend1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-02-04vs Wroten-Hot Shots-Wendtwoods ParkLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Lou Suss / Lois Haney vs Ashley Odneal / Kelli Ross0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesIna Latimer / Canan Karpiuk vs Donna Salmonsen / Carol Davis1-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesPamela Hakes / Ina Latimer vs Kathy Anderson / Tammy Rogers6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLois Haney / Maria Luisa Locht vs PAIGE PHUONG / Carol Buonfiglio0-6, 2-6
2026-01-14vs Wroten-Hot Shots-Wendtwoods ParkLost 02
L#2 DoublesTina Weber / Pamela Hakes vs Jill Polhemus / Meredith Williams4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDona Williamson / Maria Luisa Locht vs Victoria Wroten / Ashley Odneal0-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesIna Latimer / Pamela Hakes vs Stephanie Greaves / Kenita Whiteside4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMary Lou Suss / Lois Haney vs Elizabeth von Bodungen / Carrie Simms3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMaria Luisa Locht / Kathleen Castro vs Carol Buonfiglio / PAIGE PHUONG2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Pamela Hakes
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.58
Mary Lou Suss
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.16
Tina Weber
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Ina Latimer
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Maria Luisa Locht
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ina Latimer + Mary Lou Suss1440% games−0.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pamela Hakes
4W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Mary Lou Suss
35W–46L career · 7 lines in 2026
28%71%<1%
3.58
Tina Weber
18W–31L career · 6 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
Ina Latimer
2W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.13
Maria Luisa Locht
1W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.