Teams

OC - FVTC - Susie

2021 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WD - 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-12-10vs OC Great Park - NanWon 10
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Cruz / Ly Diem Nguyen Kursits vs Su Prijyanonda / Paula Nishibayashi6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-12-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesLy Diem Nguyen Kursits / Yumiko Tokiwa vs Jackie Norris / Karen Denizio6-1, 6-1
2021-11-19vs OC LLW MVTC - BondLost 01
L#2 DoublesLy Diem Nguyen Kursits / Suzanne Cruz vs Joleen Wells / Denise Vallin-Corona3-6, 5-7
2021-10-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesViviana Kim / Julie Hull vs Jane Doe / Karen Berman4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-10-01vs OC NBTC- MarieWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Thomas / Viviana Kim vs Carrie Morton / Sabrina Newton6-2, 6-2
2021-09-24vs OC NBTC - DonnaWon 10
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Cruz / Ly Diem Nguyen Kursits vs Jeannine Sandling / Kathy White6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WD - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Ly Diem Nguyen Kursits
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.10
Miho Mori
published
3.96
Yumiko Tokiwa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.75
Mary Thomas
published
3.74
Susie Ruiz
published
3.61
Julie Hull
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.57
Chunyan Chen
published 4
3.56
Jody Brennan
published
3.50
Stacy Tzur
published
3.44
Viviana Kim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Arison Hong
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jody Brennan + Stacy Tzur3448% games+9.3% vs expected
Yumiko Tokiwa + Ly Diem Nguyen Kursits303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ly Diem Nguyen Kursits
84W–76L career · 4 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
4.20
Miho Mori
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
4.10
4
Yumiko Tokiwa
209W–92L career · 10 lines in 2021
<1%64%36%
3.96
Mary Thomas
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
Susie Ruiz
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Julie Hull
94W–108L career · 7 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Chunyan Chen
17W–5L career · type M · no lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.57
Jody Brennan
9W–14L career · no lines in 2021
32%68%<1%
3.56
Stacy Tzur
5W–20L career · no lines in 2021
49%51%<1%
3.50
Viviana Kim
82W–134L career · 2 lines in 2021
69%31%<1%
3.44
3.5
Arison Hong
14W–12L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.