Teams

BP - Reavis

2023 SATA USTA Adult 18 & Over (Women) - Spring · 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.30 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Gabriela Revilla
published 3.5
3.27
Ann Lerch
published 3.5
3.26
Charlotte Lord
published 3.5
3.04
Karen Bickley
published
3.01
Wendy Schroeder
published
2.98
2.90
Tara Dorai Orcutt
published
2.90
Margaret Cribbs
published
2.75
2.57
Laura Barrett
published
Leslie Parrish
published
Lisa Reavis
published
Patti Weaver
published
Sharon DiTrani
published
Shelley Parrish
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charlotte Lord + Wendy Schroeder1446% games+6.4% vs expected
Karen Bickley + Charlotte Lord1631% games−12.5% vs expected
Karen Bickley + Wendy Schroeder134 matchesnot enough data
Laura Barrett + Patti Weaver123 matchesnot enough data
Margaret Cribbs + Tara Dorai Orcutt303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gabriela Revilla
31W–28L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Ann Lerch
12W–15L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Charlotte Lord
16W–21L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
Karen Bickley
7W–16L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
Wendy Schroeder
12W–39L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.01
3
Jacquelyn Kennedy
19W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
2.98
Tara Dorai Orcutt
21W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
2.90
Margaret Cribbs
38W–43L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Krystal Carmichael
28W–37L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
Laura Barrett
12W–18L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
2.57
Leslie Parrish
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Reavis
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Patti Weaver
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sharon DiTrani
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shelley Parrish
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.