Teams

Storelli

2025 NWW Winter Singles Flex (Counts towards YER) · 3.0 Women

1 player · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-02vs ManciniLost 01
L#1 SinglesFlavia Storelli vs Katharine Mancini6-7, 1-6
2025-03-16vs TennisFunLost 01
L#1 SinglesFlavia Storelli vs Sinead ODonovan5-7, 2-6
2025-03-15vs MendozaWon 10
W#1 SinglesFlavia Storelli vs Marites Mendoza7-6, 3-2
2025-02-22vs VikstromWon 10
W#1 SinglesFlavia Storelli vs Erin Vikstrom4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings82 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Mancini5050023
2Suman5050023
3Kate Bayley5050026
4Misiewicz (FLEXIBLE)5050011
5Bethune505009
6Hjones5050127
7Seatown5050124
8Brandt5050128
9ACHM5050125
10Escape Artist (FLEXIBLE)5050134
11Johansen4040136
12topur (FLEXIBLE)4141125
13Elsing4141227
14TennisFun4141231
15Jacobson4141333
16ifoster4141328
17J. Chen (FLEXIBLE)4141331
18Gerard (FLEXIBLE)4141332
19Clay4141442
20Baseline Warrior4141439
21Nguyen Nguyen Situation4141438
22Lai4141539
23Gegi Ward3131130
24Willgerodt3131327
25McMonigal Winter/Spring3131437
26Wallach 3.03232337
27Elly-E33232333
28Peterson3232440
29Baughman3232441
30Alana Holmquist3232546
31Nusha 3.03232548
32Sadro (FLEXIBLE)3232536
33Daniels3232545
34McCullough3232650
35PS 3.03333644
36RW - Adams3333641
37Borgonia (Can be flexible if needed)3333752
38MCretu32020014
39CARR (FLEXIBLE)2121220
40Yoshioka2121220
41Stroh2222439
42Storelli2222544
43Bai2222534
44Winter-Saelzer2222538
45Walker2323536
46NanM2323540
47SMargoles2323548
48Lau Flex2323546
49CVD2323550
50SY2323641
51TennisLove2323639
52Coomer2323641
53Bouj2323744
54ASwift101003
55Heydt1212532
56Paynter1313439
57LBrennan1313539
58Bauer1313644
59RW1414651
60mazor (FLEXIBLE)1414754
61Vikstrom1414748
62Reguera1414745
63Naffziger1414752
64Blume1414850
65SliceGirl1414851
66Borner1414857
67Barrios1414857
68Zimmer - Winter Flex 25 (FLEXIBLE)1414856
69High Five - Qin1414856
70E Runde (FLEXIBLE)1414849
71A Rolling Ross1414956
72Beaudry (FLEXIBLE)15151165
73Bibireata 30303532
74Drake, S 3.0 (FLEXIBLE)0303637
75Mama Waite0404745
76Guyumdzhyan0404848
77JSu0505854
78Soligon0505853
79Ma05051055
80Peiyuan Hu05051058
81Zubiria05051057
82Stephanie Tetrick05051055

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.65
Flavia Storelli
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Flavia Storelli
17W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.