Teams

Huffman/Knoxville

2026 Adult 40 & Over-Knoxville · 4.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.67 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-05-15vs Douglas/KnoxvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Catlett / Debi English vs Lauren Huston / Emily Elison4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPatsy Fischer / Allison Chandler vs Laura Spurgin / Paige Brown1-6, 6-7
2026-05-08vs WebbLake/KnoxvilleLost 02
L#3 DoublesPatsy Fischer / Gabriela Vidal de Ramirez vs Amy Saty / Roseanne Gardner6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#4 DoublesJill Hoschette / Melanie Johnson vs Emily Mcclenagan / Vallie Collins5-7, 1-6
2026-05-01vs Henry/KnoxvilleLost 02
L#2 DoublesPatsy Fischer / Allison Chandler vs Monica Freeman / Joan Ewers2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJill Hoschette / Melanie Johnson vs Jasmine Dabbs / Missy Shawl3-6, 0-6
2026-04-24vs Fields/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Catlett / Gabriela Vidal de Ramirez vs Julie Bankston / Jennifer Johnson3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRebecca Jones / Patsy Fischer vs Kimberly Woody / Lea Ann Fields6-3, 6-2
L#4 DoublesJill Hoschette / Stacy Carlson vs Jacque Clem / Christina Johnson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-17vs Eagen/MorganWon 10
W#4 DoublesLisa Huffman / Jennifer Catlett vs Tonja Morgan / Pamela Shirley6-3, 6-4
2026-04-10vs Douglas/KnoxvilleLost 01
L#3 DoublesPatsy Fischer / Sharon Clark vs Erin Upshaw / Emily Jenkins1-6, 2-6
2026-04-03vs WebbLake/KnoxvilleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Bell / Jennifer Catlett vs Alyssa Sprouse / Lawrie Treakle6-3, 6-4
L#4 DoublesPatsy Fischer / Stacy Carlson vs Vallie Collins / Erica Butler4-6, 0-6
2026-03-27vs Henry/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#2 DoublesDebi English / Jennifer Catlett vs Katty McFee / Joan Ewers4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Clark / Patsy Fischer vs Janene Nordin / Linda Rankin3-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesJill Hoschette / Lisa Huffman vs Lori Thompson / Kimberly Morris3-6, 0-6
2026-03-20vs Fields/KnoxvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Bell / Danielle Kwasnik vs Stacey Bristow / Cheryl Cooper2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDebi English / Jill Hoschette vs Jennifer Johnson / Julie Bankston0-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Danielle Kwasnik
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Debi English
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.54
Kristine Jones
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.49
LOURDES BLANDINO
usually #1 Singles 78%, also #4 Doubles 11% · published
3.38
Paola Martinez
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #4 Doubles 17% · published
3.37
Maja Lugonjic
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.37
Gabriela Vidal de Ramirez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.33
Rosa Luttrell
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published
3.33
Jill Hoschette
usually #1 Singles 42%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
3.29
Jennifer Catlett
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
3.16
Stacy Carlson
usually #4 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.15
Angie Goodwyn
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.11
Lisa Huffman
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #4 Doubles 44% · published
3.06
Patsy Fischer
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gabriela Vidal de Ramirez + Paola Martinez3250% games+2.3% vs expected
Lisa Huffman + Paola Martinez6254% games−0.7% vs expected
Angie Goodwyn + LOURDES BLANDINO404 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Huffman + Angie Goodwyn123 matchesnot enough data
Rosa Luttrell + Angie Goodwyn303 matchesnot enough data
Rosa Luttrell + Stacy Carlson123 matchesnot enough data
Patsy Fischer + LOURDES BLANDINO123 matchesnot enough data
Paola Martinez + Angie Goodwyn303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Danielle Kwasnik
2W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.58
3.5
Debi English
35W–16L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.55
Kristine Jones
9W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
LOURDES BLANDINO
36W–16L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
Paola Martinez
56W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Maja Lugonjic
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
Gabriela Vidal de Ramirez
17W–9L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
Rosa Luttrell
26W–26L career · 10 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Jill Hoschette
23W–31L career · 11 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Jennifer Catlett
8W–3L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Stacy Carlson
13W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Angie Goodwyn
40W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Lisa Huffman
17W–24L career · 9 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Patsy Fischer
22W–35L career · 11 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.