Teams

Post Oak Rec (Lisa Ray)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Business Women - Low · 4.0 Low (Check Eligibility List) - Monica Murray

18 players · average NTRP 3.90 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Low (Check Eligibility List) - Monica Murray have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Sarah Grasso
published
3.97
Trish D'Aquino
published
3.96
Ashley Lotz
published 4
3.90
Molly Mathes
published
3.88
Elise Graham
published
3.79
3.72
Amanda Burroughs
published 4
3.67
Jennifer Luker
published
3.65
Ekaterina Milchman
published
3.63
Becky Carspecken
published 4
3.61
Lisa Ray
published
3.59
Laura DiTomasso
published
3.55
Shannon Creasman
published
3.47
Paige Brigman
published
3.46
Barbara Wilkins
published 3.5
3.33
Lindsay Lawrence
published
Dorothy Shipskie
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Taylor Jones-Napierala + Sarah Grasso5261% games+10.7% vs expected
Barbara Wilkins + Jennifer Luker7175% games+9.7% vs expected
Ekaterina Milchman + Amanda Burroughs5453% games+9.5% vs expected
Lisa Ray + Sarah Grasso5355% games+5.2% vs expected
Trish D'Aquino + Elise Graham134 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Burroughs + Becky Carspecken123 matchesnot enough data
Shannon Creasman + Becky Carspecken303 matchesnot enough data
Trish D'Aquino + Christi Fiorentini303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Grasso
50W–31L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
4.03
Trish D'Aquino
16W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Ashley Lotz
52W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.96
Molly Mathes
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
Elise Graham
39W–27L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Christi Fiorentini
40W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Amanda Burroughs
22W–19L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.72
Jennifer Luker
22W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.67
Ekaterina Milchman
34W–21L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Becky Carspecken
10W–15L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
Lisa Ray
57W–33L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Laura DiTomasso
28W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.59
Shannon Creasman
42W–38L career · no lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.55
Paige Brigman
15W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Barbara Wilkins
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Lindsay Lawrence
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Dorothy Shipskie
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Taylor Jones-Napierala
14W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.