Teams

Zimmerman JTCC

2022 Prince Georges Adult 18 & Over · Prince Georges Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.62 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2022-06-25vs Serving You FellasSplit 11
W#1 DoublesArjun Biddanda / Jack Lavinder vs Dan Fredman / Clifton Wynter6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesScott Aronson / Peter Gwynn-Sackson vs Angel Fernandez / Larry Johnson1-6, 3-6
2022-06-19vs Net BlazersLost 02
L#2 DoublesAdam Jones / Peter Gwynn-Sackson vs Avraham Amram / Tom Smith3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJack Lavinder / Daniel Contreras vs Demetrius Crawford / Chris McNair4-6, 4-6
2022-06-18Won 10
W#2 DoublesAdam Jones / Jack Lavinder vs Chris McNair / Richard Sexton6-4, 6-2
2022-06-11vs Net BlazersSplit 11
L#2 DoublesFabrizio Cariani / Jack Lavinder vs Michael Zehr / Tom Smith3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesScott Aronson / Peter Gwynn-Sackson vs Ishmael Alejo / Richard Sexton6-2, 6-4
2022-06-11vs Net BlazersSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJack Lavinder / Adam Jones vs Tom Smith / Michael Zehr7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDaniel Contreras / Peter Gwynn-Sackson vs Chris McNair / Ishmael Alejo4-6, 1-6
2022-06-04vs Serving You FellasWon 10
W#1 SinglesJoe Pagan vs Ron Best6-4, 6-1
2022-05-22vs Net BlazersLost 01
L#3 DoublesFabrizio Cariani / Peter Gwynn-Sackson vs Chris McNair / Ishmael Alejo1-6, 2-6
2022-05-15vs Serving You FellasLost 01
L#2 DoublesJack Lavinder / Jerome Lebleu vs Randall Brater / Clifton Wynter6-7, 4-6
2022-04-24vs Serving You FellasSplit 11
L#2 DoublesConor Daly / Peter Gwynn-Sackson vs Angel Fernandez / Randall Brater4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesFabrizio Cariani / Jack Lavinder vs Ron Best / Matthew Ganney6-0, 6-3
2022-04-23Won 10
W#2 DoublesJack Lavinder / Jordan Zimmerman vs Vic-Precious Njemanze / Tom Smith6-1, 6-1
2022-04-09vs Serving You FellasWon 10
W#2 DoublesPeter Gwynn-Sackson / Fabrizio Cariani vs Marcus Moore / Matthew Ganney5-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince Georges Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Jack Lavinder
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.81
Scott Aronson
published
3.55
Peter Gwynn-Sackson
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.18
Joe Pagan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Fabrizio Cariani
published 3.5
Jerome Lebleu
published
Jordan Zimmerman
published
Shan Maitra
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jack Lavinder
98W–102L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
Scott Aronson
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
3.5
Peter Gwynn-Sackson
35W–62L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
3.55
3.5
Joe Pagan
29W–55L career · 1 line in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Fabrizio Cariani
12W–11L career · no lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
2.94
Jerome Lebleu
5W–21L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jordan Zimmerman
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Shan Maitra
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.