Teams

San Jose - Jackson

2024 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Women · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-03-10vs Boonedocks - HarrisLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelissa Brannon / Jen Frenzel vs Stephanie Vihlen / Katie Deering1-6, 2-6
2024-03-06vs Southside - GennermanLost 01
L#3 DoublesJen Frenzel / Allison Korman Shelton vs Yvonne Carter / Maria Welch2-6, 3-6
2024-02-25vs PVIC - CoffingLost 01
L#1 DoublesJen Frenzel / Rebecca Christie vs Jacqueline Bell Egan / Heather LaPrade6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2024-02-16vs Boonedocks - HarrisLost 01
L#1 DoublesJen Frenzel / Kathryn Belli vs Kelly Risdon / Kristen Surface4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-01-28vs DuvalLansang/40&Over4.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesRosemary Jackson / Amy Cochran vs Natalie Beyer / Jennifer Coffindaffer6-7, 3-6
2024-01-21vs Hidden Hills - GroceWon 10
W#1 DoublesJen Frenzel / Kathryn Belli vs Danette Jarriel / Michelle Jahn6-4, 6-2
2024-01-14vs Club Continental - PinhoWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Cochran / Jen Frenzel vs Jennelle Comiskey / Timothe Romani6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amy Cochran
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Andrea Frick
published 4
3.52
3.48
Rosemary Jackson
published
3.46
Jen Frenzel
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.31
Nancy Hennessy
published
3.19
Laurie Scott
published
3.17
Karla Liguori
published
Melissa Brannon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Tiedeberg + Andrea Frick213 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Frick + Karla Liguori123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Cochran
8W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Andrea Frick
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Catherine Tiedeberg
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
43%56%<1%
3.52
Rosemary Jackson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
3.48
Jen Frenzel
57W–44L career · 6 lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
3.46
Nancy Hennessy
14W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.31
3.5
Allison Korman Shelton
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Laurie Scott
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%8%92%
3.19
Karla Liguori
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%12%88%
3.17
Melissa Brannon
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.