Teams

SD LLW 4.5 Barnes TC/ Walker

2022 So Cal Fall Doubles - San Diego · SD Women 4.5

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-11-17vs SD 4.5 Balboa TC/ JordanWon 10
W#3 DoublesKristen Walker / Dolores Ilko vs Masako Beppu / MARCIA FIMBRES2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-11-14vs SD 4.5 La Jolla TC/ RepettiWon 10
W#3 DoublesKristen Walker / Dolores Ilko vs Laura Steenstra / Sundi Olson6-3, 6-1
2022-10-31vs SD 4.5 La Jolla TC/ RepettiWon 10
W#3 DoublesKristen Walker / Dolores Ilko vs Carolyn Barber / Fiona Taylor6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-24Won 10
W#3 DoublesAnna Palmer / Diane Ghiron vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-17vs SD 4.5 Balboa TC/ JordanLost 01
L#3 DoublesTiffinie Harpster / Anna Palmer vs Janice Draper / MARCIA FIMBRES3-6, 3-6
2022-10-03vs SD 4.5 Coronado Cays CassasusWon 20
W#2 DoublesKristen Walker / Dolores Ilko vs Gabriela Casasus / Prudence Horne6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTiffinie Harpster / Diane Ghiron vs Jada Cade / Cindy Bennett6-4, 6-1
2022-09-26vs SD 4.5 Balboa TC/ JordanWon 10
W#3 DoublesTiffinie Harpster / Dolores Ilko vs Miki Shintani / MARCIA FIMBRES6-2, 6-2
2022-09-12vs SD 4.5 Coronado Cays CassasusSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTiffinie Harpster / Carol Donahue vs Beth Mulcahy Elardo / Alexia Palacios-Peters1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDolores Ilko / Kristen Walker vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.30 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Jacqueline Rich
published 4.5
4.45
Tiffinie Harpster
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.38
Dolores Ilko
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.37
Kellie Jaquez
published 4.5
4.29
Shelley Goodson
published
4.16
Anna Palmer
published 4.5
4.16
Carol Donahue
published 4.5
4.07
Diane Ghiron
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dolores Ilko + Kellie Jaquez4269% gamesnot enough data
Dolores Ilko + Tiffinie Harpster213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jacqueline Rich
7W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
4.49
4.5
Tiffinie Harpster
49W–30L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
4.45
4.5
Dolores Ilko
160W–65L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%81%18%
4.38
4.5
Kellie Jaquez
104W–50L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
4.37
Shelley Goodson
14W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.29
4.5
Anna Palmer
11W–19L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
4.16
4.5
Carol Donahue
26W–15L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
4.16
4.5
Diane Ghiron
100W–80L career · 2 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
4.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.