Teams

BIR HOLT

2022 FW Ladies 50 & Over summer - N · A

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for A have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
3.52
Lynn Jumper
published
3.48
Ruth Strong
published
3.31
Kimberly Holt
published
3.28
Rhonda Harmon
published
3.27
Kimberly Blakey
published
JULIE ANDREWS
published 3.5
3.22
Heidi Mireiter
published 3.5
3.12
Susan Covington
published
3.07
Lisa Ingram
published
2.91
Julie Theilken
published
Elizabeth Orser
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ruth Strong + Lynn Jumper6455% games−1.9% vs expected
Susan Covington + Julie Theilken41040% games−12.1% vs expected
Elizabeth Orser + Heidi Mireiter134 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Blakey + Heidi Mireiter224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carrie Hoogendoorn
34W–21L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.75
Lynn Jumper
25W–27L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.52
Ruth Strong
12W–13L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.48
Kimberly Holt
25W–23L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Rhonda Harmon
13W–8L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
Kimberly Blakey
36W–27L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
JULIE ANDREWS
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Heidi Mireiter
8W–12L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
Susan Covington
7W–18L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.12
Lisa Ingram
3W–11L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.07
Julie Theilken
5W–21L career · no lines in 2022
76%24%<1%
2.91
3
Elizabeth Orser
2W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.