Teams

LAGUNITAS CC 18AM4.0A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-24vs BAY CLUB ROSS VALLEY 18AM4.0BWon 40
W#1 DoublesScott Niehaus / Stephen Sutro vs Olivier Jorda / Aref El Natour6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesRobert Cahill vs David Morin6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesTim Reidy vs Luke McKinlay6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesChris Zak / Matthew Caldwell vs Anthony Acquaviva / Michael Babineaux6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2025-04-20vs BAY CLUB ROSS VALLEY 18AM4.0BWon 32
W#1 DoublesCharles Williams / Cole van Brunt vs Michael Delgado / Gregory Rojas6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesTim Reidy vs David Morin6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChris Zak / Jeffrey Heely vs Michael Babineaux / Ananth Raghavan6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesScott Niehaus vs Luke McKinlay6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMark Gamble / Stephen Sutro vs Mark Burner / Anthony Acquaviva6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Robert Cahill
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.01
Cole van Brunt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.98
Scott Niehaus
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.90
Tim Reidy
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.83
Chris Zak
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.80
Patrick Higgins
published
3.75
Jeffrey Heely
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Richard Treadwell
published
3.65
Bill Lamm
published 4
3.33
Matthew Caldwell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Mark Gamble
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Robert MacNaughton
published
Stephen Sutro
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Cahill
8W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%4%96%
4.23
4
Cole van Brunt
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%48%52%
4.01
Scott Niehaus
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.98
Tim Reidy
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Chris Zak
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
Patrick Higgins
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
Jeffrey Heely
14W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Richard Treadwell
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Bill Lamm
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.65
Matthew Caldwell
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
90%10%<1%
3.33
Mark Gamble
0W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.96
Robert MacNaughton
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephen Sutro
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.