Teams

Corales/40s/4.0/FAC

2025 Man · Cov Mixed 40 & Over

16 players · average NTRP 3.89 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChad Bloodworth / Debbie Burkhalter vs Michelle Biehler / Andrew Biehler1-6, 0-6
2025-07-07Lost 01
L#1 DoublesWendi Corales / Chad Bloodworth vs Susan Rogge / Edward Dauterive1-6, 3-6
2025-06-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesApril Luscy / John Rabon vs Windy Montecino / Sidney Montecino3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-06-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Rabon / Carolyn Kalman vs Anna Catt / Jay Butcher0-6, 3-6
2025-06-16Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMelissa Verges / John Rabon vs Edward Dauterive / Susan Rogge2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChad Bloodworth / Liza Ledet DiTommaso vs Eddie Burdette / Jennifer Fell4-6, 3-6
2025-06-02Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMelanie Cook / Chad Bloodworth vs Dawn Ledet / Michael Ledet3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesVeronika Rabon / John Rabon vs Gregory Eckholdt / Windy Montecino0-6, 0-6
2025-05-19Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJohn Rabon / April Luscy vs Rodd Russell / Windy Montecino4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Cov Mixed 40 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Catt/40s/4.0/PAC8018613170
2Pausina-Eckholdt/40s/4.0/SC44141023178
3Corales/40s/4.0/FAC0842041257

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Carolyn Kalman
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published 4
Amanda Turner
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Eric Daigle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
Debbie Burkhalter
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.56
Chad Bloodworth
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.55
April Luscy
usually #3 Doubles 35%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 4
3.54
Charlotte Scott
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.49
John Rabon
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.44
David Bachemin
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.15
James Tickner
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.74
Veronika Rabon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jeff Corales
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Liza Ledet DiTommaso
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Melanie Cook
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Melissa Verges
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published
Wendi Corales
usually #1 Doubles 65%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolyn Kalman + Charlotte Scott5162% gamesnot enough data
Wendi Corales + Charlotte Scott4152% gamesnot enough data
Debbie Burkhalter + Charlotte Scott224 matchesnot enough data
April Luscy + John Rabon033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carolyn Kalman
23W–23L career · 27 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Amanda Turner
2W–10L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Eric Daigle
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Debbie Burkhalter
15W–9L career · 11 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Chad Bloodworth
2W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
April Luscy
22W–20L career · 26 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Charlotte Scott
32W–16L career · 32 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
John Rabon
5W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
David Bachemin
13W–14L career · 14 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
James Tickner
16W–23L career · 24 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.15
Veronika Rabon
22W–61L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
Jeff Corales
2W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Liza Ledet DiTommaso
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melanie Cook
6W–17L career · 20 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Verges
18W–17L career · 23 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wendi Corales
21W–13L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.