Teams

WildBlue - King

2025 LEECHARLOTTE Combo 18 & Over Winter · 8.5 M

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2025-03-30vs Winter Winner/FGCU-CrivelloLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoe Taylor / Ken Johnson vs Kevin Tran / Josh Weinstein3-6, 3-6
2025-03-17vs Lake Kennedy - McGirlWon 10
W#1 DoublesCharles Klass / Ken Johnson vs Felix Varlam / Joseph Hall6-4, 6-3
2025-03-10vs CCRC - DennisWon 10
W#1 DoublesKen Johnson / Chris King vs Chris Terpko / Timothy Nuss7-6, 6-4
2025-03-03vs Winter Winner/FGCU-CrivelloLost 01
L#2 DoublesKen Johnson / Jeff Berns vs Kevin Tran / El-Sire Douglas2-6, 3-6
2025-02-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesChris King / Ken Johnson vs Alex Smith / Ishit Upadhyay6-3, 6-4
2025-02-17vs CCRC - DennisWon 10
W#2 DoublesGregory Matthews / Ken Johnson vs Timothy Nuss / Timothy Daly6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-02-10vs Winter Winner/FGCU-CrivelloLost 01
L#3 DoublesKen Johnson / Doug Congress vs Jose Camacho / Alejandro Diaz Lucente2-6, 5-7
2025-02-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesDoug Congress / Ken Johnson vs Joseph Hall / Alex Smith6-1, 6-0
2025-01-27vs CCRC - DennisWon 10
W#2 DoublesDoug Congress / Ken Johnson vs Thomas Durichen / Kevin Adams6-3, 6-4
2025-01-20vs Winter Winner/FGCU-CrivelloWon 10
W#1 DoublesChris King / Ken Johnson vs Dennis Barlotta / Josh Weinstein7-6, 6-4
2025-01-13vs Lake Kennedy - McGirlWon 10
W#2 DoublesKen Johnson / Jeff Berns vs Julian Rivero / Alex Smith6-0, 6-1
2025-01-07vs CCRC - DennisWon 10
W#2 DoublesChris King / Ken Johnson vs Thomas Durichen / James Cahill6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 M have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Mike Bobitski
published
4.08
Ken Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published
3.94
Corey Kotlarz
published 4
3.89
Jeff Berns
published
3.87
Shane Lefebvre
published
Charles Klass
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Corey Kotlarz + Mike Bobitski033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mike Bobitski
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
4.11
Ken Johnson
77W–48L career · 12 lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
4.08
4
Corey Kotlarz
5W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
Jeff Berns
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.89
Shane Lefebvre
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.87
4
Charles Klass
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.