Teams

My HOmies

2023 Montgomery Singles Summer · Montgomery Singles 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-28vs SoloistsWon 10
W#3 SinglesAlexis McCary vs Kelsey Forbes6-2, 6-4
2023-08-17vs Everything Bagels W4.0Won 10
W#1 SinglesAlexis McCary vs Chanpen Teeranon7-5, 5-4
2023-08-14vs SoloistsLost 01
L#3 SinglesAlexis McCary vs Eboni Lance2-6, 1-6
2023-08-08vs Everything Bagels W4.0Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAlexis McCary vs Elena Molchanova3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-07-28vs Everything Bagels W4.0Lost 01
L#3 SinglesEvelien Josselin vs Jelena Mitrovic6-7, 2-6
2023-07-12vs SoloistsWon 10
W#3 SinglesAlexis McCary vs Arina Kravitz7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Singles 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Evelien Josselin
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
4.02
Kim Dowd
published
3.92
Jemine Bryon
published
3.83
Alexis McCary
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.71
Robin Burton
published
3.28
Cora Ho
published 3.5
Kristin Quackenbush
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Allison Papadopoulos
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Evelien Josselin
202W–69L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%17%83%
4.13
Kim Dowd
22W–43L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
4.02
Jemine Bryon
56W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
3.92
4
Alexis McCary
143W–108L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
Robin Burton
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
3.5
Cora Ho
120W–87L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Kristin Quackenbush
20W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.