Teams

Sports Mall-Stroud-Peterson/Farr

2026 Fall Outdoor League-Saturday · 3.5W

14 players · average NTRP 3.15 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings12 teams · 3.5W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SM-Harris & the Serve-Ivors000000
2Sports Mall-Finlay000000
3Liberty Park-Causing a Racquet000000
4Park City MARC-Krueger/Siano000000
5SLTHC-Bayna000000
6Cottonwood-Haverkost/Nielsen000000
7SLTHC-Haroldsen/Leatham000000
8Liberty Park-Prince-Hagood/Kesler000000
9Trentman000000
10SunPro Advantage000000
11Spencer000000
12Sports Mall-Stroud-Peterson/Farr000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Lexi Farr
published 3.5
3.19
Elsa Hagos
published 3.5
3.13
Jenni Guynn
published
3.08
Kendall McKinnon
published 3.5
3.04
Chelsea Spencer
published 3
3.03
Caitlin Brewer
published 3
2.97
Tori Locke
published
2.95
Annie Mortensen
published 3
2.83
Jessica Eckert
published
2.83
Chelsea Wood
published 3
2.79
2.65
Lindsey Pizza
published 3
2.57
Chantel Wall
published 3
Megan Moore
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chelsea Spencer + Annie Mortensen13267% games+12.4% vs expected
Lexi Farr + Jessica Eckert8063% games+11.7% vs expected
Tori Locke + Chelsea Wood4153% games+10.6% vs expected
Tori Locke + Jessica Eckert12458% games+6.0% vs expected
Lexi Farr + Tori Locke332253% games+5.9% vs expected
Naomi Stroud-Peterson + Jessica Eckert6354% games+5.7% vs expected
Jessica Eckert + Annie Mortensen9755% games+3.0% vs expected
Naomi Stroud-Peterson + Annie Mortensen5349% games−1.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lexi Farr
160W–72L career · no lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.70
3.5
Elsa Hagos
39W–41L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Jenni Guynn
19W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.13
3.5
Kendall McKinnon
5W–11L career · type S · no lines in 2026
27%72%<1%
3.08
3
Chelsea Spencer
69W–52L career · no lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Caitlin Brewer
15W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.03
Tori Locke
108W–86L career · no lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Annie Mortensen
89W–52L career · no lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Jessica Eckert
89W–37L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Chelsea Wood
63W–112L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Naomi Stroud-Peterson
139W–157L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Lindsey Pizza
38W–53L career · no lines in 2026
14%86%1%
2.65
3
Chantel Wall
7W–10L career · type S · no lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.57
Megan Moore
8W–14L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.