Teams

CASTLEWOOD CC 18MX6.0A

2025 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX6.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
L#1 DoublesJulie Gundermann / Scot Satterlund vs Vikas Mahajan / Christina Cordoza3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCheryl Moeller / Tae Yoon vs Jaclyn Rosete / Ryan Rosete3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18&Over MX6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Julie Gundermann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Heather Paquette
published
2.97
Stephanie Wendell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Maria Satterlund
published
David Camp
published 3
2.71
Christina Grimes
published 3
2.70
Cheryl Moeller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
2.69
Debra Mallie
published 3
2.67
Jackelyne Ferreira
published
2.35
JONI HIRTH
published
2.14
Jen Johnson
published
Michael Mallie
published
Mike Mannwieler
published
Neil Wendell
published
Scot Satterlund
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Winthrop Wu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scot Satterlund + Maria Satterlund1428% gamesnot enough data
Mike Mannwieler + Stephanie Wendell303 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Wendell + Neil Wendell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Gundermann
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Heather Paquette
20W–29L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Stephanie Wendell
28W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Maria Satterlund
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
3
David Camp
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Christina Grimes
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Cheryl Moeller
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
3
Allyson Tevrizian
8W–15L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Debra Mallie
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Jackelyne Ferreira
11W–17L career · no lines in 2025
0%11%89%
2.67
JONI HIRTH
2W–11L career · no lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
2.35
Jen Johnson
3W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.14
Michael Mallie
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mike Mannwieler
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Neil Wendell
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Scot Satterlund
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Winthrop Wu
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.