Teams

RTerrell (OPRC)

2025 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Men - Mon PM

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-28vs THodge (Blakeney)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Reishman / Kent Smith vs Ganesh Pallem / Chirag Dua2-6, 2-6
2025-04-21vs PKartes/PBlandford (Mountainbrook)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMichael Reishman / Taylor Stone vs Heyward Bouknight / Jared Kleber7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-04-14vs KFranks (PPRSC)Won 20
W#2 DoublesDaniel Thailer / Aaron Ligon vs Chris McIver / Trevor Zimmer6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMario Flores / Michael Reishman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-24vs TKasler (Matthews)Split 11
L#2 DoublesJohn Nurkin / Daniel Thailer vs Randy Loman / Jim Bailer4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKent Smith / Michael Reishman vs Douglas Skrainka / Larry Pratt6-3, 6-3
2025-03-19vs MRyan (Carmel)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMichael Reishman / Kent Smith vs Victor Adams / George Sistrunk2-6, 2-6
2025-03-17vs WDawson (Olde Providence)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesMichael Reishman / Aaron Ligon vs Zachary Wagner / Tommy Cary3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Nurkin / Daniel Thailer vs Brian Zapata / Jerry Lee1-6, 4-6
2025-03-03vs JDichak (WSRC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesDaniel Thailer / Aaron Ligon vs Alberto Botero / Ron Dock7-5, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Men - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Kent Smith
published
3.34
Matt Chambers
published
3.24
Michel Abranches
published
3.19
Daniel Thailer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
John Nurkin
published
3.08
Andrew McWilliams
published 3.5
3.06
Michael Reishman
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
3.03
Mario Flores
published
2.98
Rusty Parker
published
2.95
Aaron Ligon
published 3
Taylor Stone
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kent Smith
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Matt Chambers
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Michel Abranches
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Daniel Thailer
12W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
John Nurkin
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Andrew McWilliams
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.08
3
Michael Reishman
36W–33L career · 14 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
Mario Flores
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Rusty Parker
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.98
3
Aaron Ligon
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
Taylor Stone
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.