Teams

Reyes (Ron Ehmann)

2021 Miami-Dade Adult 40 & Over - Fall Day · 3.5 Adult Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.61 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Claudia Viso
published 4
3.74
Fernanda Abreu
published 4
3.67
Maria Jose Jorquera
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.59
Damarys Vega
published 4
3.49
Patricia Pico
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.32
Tiffany Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.27
Ana Arazoza
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Ana Maria Rebora
published 3.5
3.21
Natalia Bonzon
published
3.20
Adriana Faillace
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Blaire Molina
published 3.5
3.12
Sandra Raynaud
published
3.11
Kelly Mc Cormick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.09
Tricia Kleinberg
published
2.90
Rosemarie Reyes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.49
Ana Alarcon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tiffany Garcia + Patricia Pico291757% games+6.0% vs expected
Kelly Mc Cormick + Ana Arazoza91254% games−0.5% vs expected
Ana Arazoza + Patricia Pico16856% games−0.9% vs expected
Rosemarie Reyes + Kelly Mc Cormick263346% games−3.5% vs expected
Ana Arazoza + Tiffany Garcia6551% games−8.0% vs expected
Kelly Mc Cormick + Tiffany Garcia6652% gamesnot enough data
Rosemarie Reyes + Adriana Faillace3647% gamesnot enough data
Tiffany Garcia + Maria Jose Jorquera8163% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Claudia Viso
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Fernanda Abreu
14W–14L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
Maria Jose Jorquera
146W–116L career · 6 lines in 2021
10%89%1%
3.67
4
Damarys Vega
1W–7L career · no lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.59
Patricia Pico
74W–53L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%53%47%
3.49
Tiffany Garcia
70W–46L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Ana Arazoza
102W–75L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Ana Maria Rebora
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Natalia Bonzon
14W–13L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Adriana Faillace
82W–81L career · 3 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Blaire Molina
5W–4L career · no lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.15
Sandra Raynaud
1W–7L career · no lines in 2021
17%82%<1%
3.12
Kelly Mc Cormick
97W–105L career · 4 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.11
Tricia Kleinberg
2W–9L career · no lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Rosemarie Reyes
74W–107L career · 3 lines in 2021
78%22%<1%
2.90
3
Ana Alarcon
36W–105L career · 1 line in 2021
53%47%<1%
2.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.