Teams

Deep Run Kelly

2025 Richmond Mixed 40 & Over · Richmond Mixed 40 & Over 9.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.62 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-03vs Belmont GregoryWon 20
W#2 DoublesMegan Alwine / Tom Bryan vs Heather Barefoot / Konstantin Dombrovskiy7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLeslie Altaffer / Stuart Fulcher vs Jill Campbell / Brett Sinsabaugh6-4, 7-5
2025-06-30vs Belmont GregorySplit 11
L#1 DoublesMegan Alwine / Drew Lineberger vs Lindsay Bazydlo / Diego Alejandro Parada3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLauren Palmer / Stuart Fulcher vs Heather Barefoot / Konstantin Dombrovskiy6-0, 6-3
2025-06-09vs Belmont GregoryWon 20
W#2 DoublesLeslie Altaffer / Drew Lineberger vs Laura Lafors / Tommy Bader6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLauren Palmer / Stuart Fulcher vs Jill Campbell / Ben Hall4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-06-02vs Belmont GregoryLost 01
L#3 DoublesMegan Alwine / Todd Prince vs Laura Lafors / Ben Hall2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 40 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.26 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.82
Clara Laing
published 5
4.42
Leslie Altaffer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.40
Kevin Long
published
4.32
Lauren Palmer
published
4.32
Megan Alwine
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.26
Tom Bryan
published
4.20
Elizabeth Kelly
published
4.17
Todd Prince
published
4.16
Ryan Baker
published
4.12
Stuart Fulcher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.68
Lauren Jones
published
Drew Lineberger
published
Emily Edens
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Clara Laing
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.82
4.5
Leslie Altaffer
72W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
4.42
Kevin Long
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.40
Lauren Palmer
17W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Megan Alwine
110W–60L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
4.32
Tom Bryan
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
Elizabeth Kelly
35W–21L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
4.20
Todd Prince
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
4.17
Ryan Baker
27W–11L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
4.16
4.5
Stuart Fulcher
149W–170L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
4.12
Lauren Jones
17W–7L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Drew Lineberger
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Emily Edens
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.