Teams

Sunset Aces

2024 USTA Adult 18 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 3.0 WE

15 players · average NTRP 3.12 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-06-15vs WACtown Girls!Won 10
W#1 DoublesJANE HUANG / Suzanne Hartz vs Marty Fraser / Robbie Knauer6-4, 6-2
2024-06-09vs V-LLW Westlake Monarchs - BuehringLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Khiem / Suzanne Hartz vs Lauren Ruitberg / Hannah Buehring5-7, 3-6
2024-05-25vs Spanish Hills Glamour SlammersWon 10
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Hartz / Marcela Cepeda vs Vyara Stephenson / Katy Greenwood7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.0 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Patty Starkey
published
3.31
Inna Skripnikova
published
3.21
Jennifer Khiem
published
2.98
Callie Paranick
published 3.5
2.90
2.89
Dawn Stutzman
published 3
2.89
JANE HUANG
published
2.85
Nora Valentino
published
Christina Yumul
published 3
2.68
Suzanne Hartz
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.67
Heather Kawai
published
2.60
Marcela Cepeda
published
2.50
Sophie Clowes
published
2.09
Marianne Acerboni
published
Lydia Davila
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Kawai + Nora Valentino4251% games+7.2% vs expected
Suzanne Hartz + Nora Valentino134 matchesnot enough data
Dawn Stutzman + Callie Paranick224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patty Starkey
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.34
Inna Skripnikova
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
Jennifer Khiem
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Callie Paranick
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.98
3
Catherine Loubier
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%24%
2.90
3
Dawn Stutzman
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.89
JANE HUANG
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
79%21%<1%
2.89
Nora Valentino
19W–18L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Christina Yumul
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Suzanne Hartz
55W–81L career · 5 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
Heather Kawai
15W–16L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
Marcela Cepeda
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
2.60
Sophie Clowes
5W–11L career · no lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
2.50
Marianne Acerboni
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
2.09
Lydia Davila
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.