← Teams

PTC-Kanz/Meyers

2019 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 3.43 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Danielle Cuenco
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.25
John Kin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Jeff Marshall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Colleen Walker
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
ANTHONY PEPE
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.75
William Seidl
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3
—
Joy Meyers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results8 ties
2018-11-11Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesTony Kalil / Danielle Cuenco vs Vicki Blunt / Mike Rebar6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJoy Meyers / Henry Kofron vs Cheryl Geisler / Steve Thunstedt6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesFiona Tait / John Kin vs Donna Weyand / Jon Peters6-2, 0-6, 1-0
2018-11-10Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesHolly Kanz / John Kin vs Catherine Leedy / Dave Hall6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJoy Meyers / Tony Kalil vs Alan Peters / Carol Robertson6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesColleen Walker / Henry Kofron vs Jeffrey Bayless / Elizabeth Burns7-6, 6-4
2018-10-26Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesTony Kalil / Danielle Cuenco vs Marianne Conroy / Benjamin Brewer6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesHolly Kanz / John Kin vs Victoria Soderstrom / Kevin Semonsen6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJoy Meyers / Henry Kofron vs Ann Skoog / Douglas Brewer6-2, 7-5
2018-10-21Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesTony Kalil / Danielle Cuenco vs Tara Delarosa / Jim Nudelman6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHolly Kanz / John Kin vs Thor Deacon / Naomi Steinberg6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesFiona Tait / ANTHONY PEPE vs Marco Bas / Adriana Caliri0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2018-10-05Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesTony Kalil / Danielle Cuenco vs John Yu / Angie Lee6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHenry Kofron / Joy Meyers vs NANDA SIDDAIAH / Andrea Vicino6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWilliam Seidl / Holly Kanz vs Rakesh Chirravuri / Angelina Warriner6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2018-09-30Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesHolly Kanz / John Kin vs Kelley Gaylor / Dean Gaylor6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesANTHONY PEPE / Danielle Cuenco vs Julie Gorecki / Daniel Gorecki7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJoy Meyers / Tony Kalil vs Lee Wilcox / Jacqueline Wilcox1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2018-09-23Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesHenry Kofron / Colleen Walker vs Shawn Boyce / Sara Shah6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJeff Marshall / Fiona Tait vs Rajan Mehndiratta / Kusum Mehndiratta6-2, 6-2
2018-09-09Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJohn Kin / Danielle Cuenco vs Michelle Dombek / Dan Wolff6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJoy Meyers / William Seidl vs Thomas Hilts / Edwardeen Hilts6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesColleen Walker / Jeff Marshall vs Tom Clemente / Jane Pinkowski6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Danielle Cuenco
89W–56L career
1%99%0%
3.76
3.5
John Kin
39W–36L career · type M
6%91%3%
3.25
3.5
Jeff Marshall
46W–60L career
1%99%0%
3.24
3.5
Colleen Walker
58W–78L career
9%91%0%
3.14
3.5
ANTHONY PEPE
24W–36L career
25%75%0%
3.06
3
William Seidl
58W–56L career
3%96%1%
2.75
3
Joy Meyers
46W–50L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.