Teams

UPTA55A/Joffe/Thornblade

2026 UPTA Adult 55 & Over - USTA · 55+ Adult Women - 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.30 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-15vs UPTA55A/Boliek/GCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Rudman / Amy Williams vs Carol Farnsworth / Dawn Lucas2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPamela Finigan / Patty B Counihan vs Margaret Boliek / Kathy Cottingham2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesErin Byxbee / Cathy Spitzmiller vs Ann Ellison / Lisa Mann7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2026-04-08vs UPTA55A/Thomas/Keowee KeyLost 12
L#1 DoublesNancy Rudman / Denise Ruby vs Patricia Joy / Melissa Coles3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAngela Joffe / Marie Crumpler vs Dana Loring / Johnna Neri5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPatty B Counihan / Sally Seaver vs Sharon Thomas / Christine Woerz6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-24vs UPTA55A/Lawlor/KrocWon 21
W#1 DoublesAngela Joffe / Marie Crumpler vs Missy Lawlor / Elizabeth Vandiver6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNancy Rudman / Denise Ruby vs Lisa Maurides / Martha Gower2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCathy Spitzmiller / Sally Seaver vs Jill Wolf / Lauren McCullough2-6, 5-7
2026-03-18vs UPTA (B) 3.5W 55 & Over (Darrow)Won 21
W#1 DoublesAngela Joffe / Nancy Rudman vs Liz Darrow / Edie Clator6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Williams / Pamela Finigan vs Carol McCoy / MADHAVI KAMIREDDI6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMarie Crumpler / Cathy Spitzmiller vs Catherine Hunt / Carol Kooistra3-6, 1-6
2026-03-11vs UPTA55A/Gruendling/CardinalLost 12
L#1 DoublesNancy Rudman / Jane Miller vs Susan Krzeminski / Katherine Robinson2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMarie Crumpler / Denise Ruby vs Denise Malone / Nancy Lanois6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPamela Finigan / Angela Joffe vs Sandi Tolly / Dianne White3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-03-04vs UPTA55A/Blide/Keowee KeyLost 12
L#1 DoublesDenise Ruby / Amy Williams vs Stacey Belkin / CRYSTAL BLIDE6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAngela Joffe / Marie Crumpler vs Jan Kelley / Leslie Colomb6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCathy Spitzmiller / Sally Seaver vs Adrianne Brandecker / Kathy Elam6-3, 6-1
2026-02-25vs UPTA55A/Mendes/SpindletreeLost 12
L#1 DoublesDenise Ruby / Sally Seaver vs Jacquie Eddy / Suzanne Pauley4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Rudman / Amy Williams vs Eva Mellert / Mary Beth Lyles4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAngela Joffe / Pamela Finigan vs Tarina Mendes / Susan Jennings6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55+ Adult Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Denise Ruby
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
Marie Crumpler
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.21
Sally Seaver
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.11
Angela Joffe
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Nancy Rudman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.09
Pamela Finigan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.06
Cathy Spitzmiller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Erin Byxbee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Carrie Dickert
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Shelley Mckay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Patty B Counihan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.80
Sena Claxton
published
2.63
Jane Miller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Amy Cupples
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Cupples + Cathy Spitzmiller4155% games+10.2% vs expected
Pamela Finigan + Angela Joffe3643% games+8.9% vs expected
Sena Claxton + Angela Joffe3548% games+1.1% vs expected
Sena Claxton + Patty B Counihan3642% games−2.4% vs expected
Angela Joffe + Marie Crumpler2356% games−4.8% vs expected
Pamela Finigan + Cathy Spitzmiller3249% gamesnot enough data
Sally Seaver + Cathy Spitzmiller213 matchesnot enough data
Amy Cupples + Erin Byxbee213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Ruby
12W–9L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
Marie Crumpler
9W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Sally Seaver
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Angela Joffe
28W–34L career · 6 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
Nancy Rudman
6W–23L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.10
Pamela Finigan
18W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
25%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Cathy Spitzmiller
15W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.06
Erin Byxbee
54W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.92
3
Carrie Dickert
9W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Shelley Mckay
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
Patty B Counihan
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
91%9%<1%
2.81
Sena Claxton
14W–33L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80
Jane Miller
26W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
0%18%82%
2.63
3
Amy Cupples
16W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
2.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.