← Teams

VTC-Wilcox

2021 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.57 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Dean Gaylor
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.33
Andy LaFrazia
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
John Wallin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Denise Dawkins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
—
Jim Hamlik
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
—
Kim Hamlik
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.18
Kelley Gaylor
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Mark Dawkins
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 0
Results11 ties
2021-09-26Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesMark Dawkins / Kim Hamlik vs Janet Lui-Hansen / John Cherry6-4, 6-1
2021-09-26Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesKim Hamlik / Jim Hamlik vs Tim Pyle / Diane Murray6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2021-09-25Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesJim Hamlik / Kim Hamlik vs Darillyn Flones / Larry Woodward6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMark Dawkins / Denise Dawkins vs Cynthia Noyd / Bryan Noyd6-2, 6-1
2021-07-10Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesAndy LaFrazia / Cheryl Hopkins vs Bill Lowblad / Mary Lowblad7-5, 6-2
2021-07-02Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesCheryl Hopkins / Andy LaFrazia vs Ann Davidson / Jeff Anhaltzer6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDenise Dawkins / Mark Dawkins vs Lori Zoborowski / Gerald Chase6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKelley Gaylor / Jim Hamlik vs Susan Douglas / Steve Douglas6-1, 6-1
2021-06-20Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesDean Gaylor / Cheryl Hopkins vs Steven Keo / Susan Rolfe4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJim Hamlik / Kim Hamlik vs Leslie Rosenberg / Kirk Planck6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTrylla Lembke / John Wallin vs Sandra Ellis / Edmund Yuan6-2, 6-1
2021-06-19Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesKim Hamlik / Jim Hamlik vs Kirk Planck / Leslie Rosenberg2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCheryl Hopkins / Andy LaFrazia vs Paul Stutzman / Jeny Joseph6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTrylla Lembke / John Wallin vs Steven Keo / Wanda Ng4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-06-13Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesMark Dawkins / Denise Dawkins vs Patricia Sturr / Craig Mills1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKim Hamlik / Jim Hamlik vs Tony Moreno / Ming Shyan Kao7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKelley Gaylor / Dean Gaylor vs Andy Pihl / Kris Kelly-Koster6-3, 6-4
2021-06-06Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesMark Dawkins / Denise Dawkins vs Joann Donahue / Gerald Chase2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-05-23Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesKim Hamlik / Jim Hamlik vs Colin Looi / Angie Lee6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDean Gaylor / Kelley Gaylor vs Donna Kennish / Dick Kennish7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2021-05-15Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesDenise Dawkins / Mark Dawkins vs Brenna Dramov / Devin McMasters6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Dean Gaylor
88W–63L career
12%88%1%
3.66
3.5
Andy LaFrazia
65W–34L career
4%86%10%
3.33
3.5
John Wallin
66W–61L career
5%91%4%
3.27
3.5
Denise Dawkins
59W–54L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Jim Hamlik
33W–46L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Kim Hamlik
24W–44L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Kelley Gaylor
68W–64L career
10%89%1%
3.18
0
Mark Dawkins
24W–15L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.