Teams

Copsey 4.0

2025 Howard Singles · Howard Singles 4.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-11-14vs Yeessir 4.0Won 20
W#1 SinglesAlan Copsey vs Jeffrey Bauer6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesScott Mennealy vs John Yee6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2025-10-26vs Ghim - Wild Cards-singlesWon 20
W#1 SinglesAlan Copsey vs Tucker Howard6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesAndrew Aylward vs Kwangsoo Jeon6-2, 7-6
2025-10-25vs Khan - KTA 4.0Split 11
W#1 SinglesScott Mennealy vs Yusuf Higazi6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesAndrew Aylward vs Keming Wu6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-10-19vs Foehrkolb - Mishit Winners 4.0Lost 01
L#2 SinglesAlan Copsey vs Samuel Sobkov6-7, 3-2, 0-1
2025-10-10vs Khan - KTA 4.0Lost 01
L#3 SinglesAlan Copsey vs Alexander Gerson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-07vs Khan - KTA 4.0Split 11
L#1 SinglesScott Mennealy vs Alexander Gerson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 SinglesAndrew Aylward vs Yusuf Higazi6-1, 6-0
2025-09-30vs Ghim - Wild Cards-singlesLost 01
L#2 SinglesAndrew Aylward vs Tucker Howard3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-09-27vs Foehrkolb - Mishit Winners 4.0Split 11
W#1 SinglesScott Mennealy vs Arthur Chaite6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesAndrew Aylward vs Dave Taylor0-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-09-12vs Foehrkolb - Mishit Winners 4.0Won 20
W#2 SinglesScott Mennealy vs Shoubhit Ravi6-0, 6-2
W#3 SinglesAndrew Aylward vs Avik Dayal1-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Singles 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
William Briscoe
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.96
Scott Mennealy
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.87
Eric DesRoberts
published 4
3.85
Alan Copsey
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.82
Andrew Aylward
usually #3 Singles 70%, also #2 Singles 30% · published 4
3.65
Joseph Kurtz
published
3.60
Brian Wagner
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Mennealy + Alan Copsey3254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William Briscoe
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.12
4
Scott Mennealy
104W–66L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Eric DesRoberts
42W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Alan Copsey
58W–39L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Andrew Aylward
54W–67L career · 10 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
Joseph Kurtz
10W–1L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Brian Wagner
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.