Teams

JDS-REGISTER

2024 MATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Spring · 3.0 Women Night Monday

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-04-01Won 10
W#2 SinglesJennifer Davis vs Andrea Goff6-2, 6-1
2024-03-25vs IHCC-YARBROUGHLost 01
L#2 SinglesJennifer Davis vs Lindsey Rowland5-7, 3-6
2024-03-18Won 10
W#2 SinglesJennifer Davis vs Amelia Harpe-Mills6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2024-02-26vs IHCC-HILLLost 01
L#2 SinglesJennifer Davis vs Anna Sharpton4-6, 1-6
2024-02-21vs IHCC-YARBROUGHLost 01
L#3 DoublesCourtney Carr / Jennifer Davis vs Eryn Deiler / Cassie Brannen0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Night Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Elizabeth Herndon
published
2.87
Jennifer Davis
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.79
Julie Register
published
2.79
Tanja Battle
published
Anna Richards
published 3
2.74
Yvonne Apodaca
published
2.71
Jennifer Pritchard
published
2.66
Heather DeRojas
published
2.63
Kristin Stephens
published
2.62
Ellen Duggan
published
2.59
Stacy Carr
published
2.56
Patricia Waite
published
2.05
Lauren Mauldin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Carr + Julie Register2738% games−1.6% vs expected
Ellen Duggan + Julie Register2545% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Herndon + Julie Register2347% gamesnot enough data
Ellen Duggan + Stacy Carr134 matchesnot enough data
Heather DeRojas + Kristin Stephens044 matchesnot enough data
Heather DeRojas + Stacy Carr134 matchesnot enough data
Heather DeRojas + Yvonne Apodaca224 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Herndon + Stacy Carr033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Herndon
29W–44L career · no lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
2.95
3
Jennifer Davis
12W–15L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.87
Julie Register
22W–28L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
Tanja Battle
20W–22L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Anna Richards
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Yvonne Apodaca
12W–16L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
Jennifer Pritchard
11W–18L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
Heather DeRojas
13W–21L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.66
Kristin Stephens
7W–22L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
2.63
Ellen Duggan
10W–19L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
2.62
Stacy Carr
8W–19L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
2.59
Patricia Waite
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
2.56
Lauren Mauldin
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.